A review of work being published in our journals establishes that we most often think of ourselves as passive intellectuals, engaged in critical reflection about rhetorics of science and technology. But another persona lurks in that scholarship as well—the rhetorician as agent of change making the world a better place. This paper argues that rhetoricians of science and technology need to think harder about how we take the academic understandings developed in our primary internal discursive genre and transform them into productive engagements with external publics. Whether we encounter those publics in the classroom or in civic forums or in scientific or technical organizations, we need to be able to translate our research findings to these ...
In this review essay, we look back at the evolution of the rhetoric of science by reviewing the ...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...
The purpose of this capstone is to identify rhetoric in public-facing science communication, and to ...
A review of work being published in our journals establishes that we most often think of ourselves a...
Rhetoricians involved in funded collaborative research with scientists have discussed some of their ...
There is a necessary and growing preoccupation in rhetoric of science with the real-world consequenc...
Leaders of the science establishment are seeking help with communicating science to the public. Rhet...
We argue that the rhetoric of science occupies an important niche in contemporary science studies. A...
Abstract: The set of rhetorical engagements in science, technology and medicine presented at the 201...
This response to papers by Leah Ceccarelli, Randy Harris, and Carl Herndl and Lauren Cutlip in the “...
Growing attention to a rift between epistemology and ontology, between words and things, sets new ch...
Contemporary concerns about public engagement in science communication collaboratives are a pressing...
In Poroi’s 2013 special issue “Inventing the Future: The Rhetorics of Science, Technology, and Medic...
Condit, Prelli, and Depew and Lyne offer useful taxonomies of scholarship in the rhetoric of science...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...
In this review essay, we look back at the evolution of the rhetoric of science by reviewing the ...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...
The purpose of this capstone is to identify rhetoric in public-facing science communication, and to ...
A review of work being published in our journals establishes that we most often think of ourselves a...
Rhetoricians involved in funded collaborative research with scientists have discussed some of their ...
There is a necessary and growing preoccupation in rhetoric of science with the real-world consequenc...
Leaders of the science establishment are seeking help with communicating science to the public. Rhet...
We argue that the rhetoric of science occupies an important niche in contemporary science studies. A...
Abstract: The set of rhetorical engagements in science, technology and medicine presented at the 201...
This response to papers by Leah Ceccarelli, Randy Harris, and Carl Herndl and Lauren Cutlip in the “...
Growing attention to a rift between epistemology and ontology, between words and things, sets new ch...
Contemporary concerns about public engagement in science communication collaboratives are a pressing...
In Poroi’s 2013 special issue “Inventing the Future: The Rhetorics of Science, Technology, and Medic...
Condit, Prelli, and Depew and Lyne offer useful taxonomies of scholarship in the rhetoric of science...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...
In this review essay, we look back at the evolution of the rhetoric of science by reviewing the ...
The future of the rhetoric of science—which will increasingly take the form of a rhetoric of technol...
The purpose of this capstone is to identify rhetoric in public-facing science communication, and to ...