Add to ORKGWhen presented with evidence that Crump et al.’s criteria are satisfied for the animals in some taxon, a sceptic could reasonably continue to suspend judgement about whether those animals are sentient. This is because the criteria refer to abilities which are associated with sentience in humans, but it is not clear that sentience is necessary for these abilities. The criteria could be strengthed by requiring evidence of a contrast in performance between cases in which information is carried by felt and unfelt states
The criteria for determining animal sentience proposed in the target article are sensible but they l...
Crump et al.’s framework is a powerful tool designed to assist decisions on the ethical treatment of...
The criteria proposed by Crump et al. are based on various cognitive roles associated with sentience...
When presented with evidence that Crump et al.’s criteria are satisfied for the animals in some taxo...
“Sentience” means the capacity to feel, and feelings are private affairs. Sentience is hence extreme...
The eight criteria proposed in Crump et al.’s framework for evaluating pain sentience in decapod cru...
This commentary maps out relationships of dependency between the criteria proposed in the target art...
In the target article Crump et al. present 8 criteria to assess whether decapods experience pain. Fo...
The framework proposed by Crump et al. still leaves much doubt about whether invertebrates such as c...
Crump et al. define eight criteria indicating sentience in animals, with a focus on pain. Here, we p...
On the basis of the target article by Crump and colleagues, we suggest a more parsimonious scheme fo...
Most commentaries on our target article broadly support our approach to evaluating evidence of anima...
This commentary supports Crump et al.’s (2022) point that where risks to welfare are severe, strong ...
We outline a framework for evaluating scientific evidence of sentience, focusing on pain experience....
Crump et al. provide eight criteria for evaluating sentience in decapods, with scope for for applica...
The criteria for determining animal sentience proposed in the target article are sensible but they l...
Crump et al.’s framework is a powerful tool designed to assist decisions on the ethical treatment of...
The criteria proposed by Crump et al. are based on various cognitive roles associated with sentience...
When presented with evidence that Crump et al.’s criteria are satisfied for the animals in some taxo...
“Sentience” means the capacity to feel, and feelings are private affairs. Sentience is hence extreme...
The eight criteria proposed in Crump et al.’s framework for evaluating pain sentience in decapod cru...
This commentary maps out relationships of dependency between the criteria proposed in the target art...
In the target article Crump et al. present 8 criteria to assess whether decapods experience pain. Fo...
The framework proposed by Crump et al. still leaves much doubt about whether invertebrates such as c...
Crump et al. define eight criteria indicating sentience in animals, with a focus on pain. Here, we p...
On the basis of the target article by Crump and colleagues, we suggest a more parsimonious scheme fo...
Most commentaries on our target article broadly support our approach to evaluating evidence of anima...
This commentary supports Crump et al.’s (2022) point that where risks to welfare are severe, strong ...
We outline a framework for evaluating scientific evidence of sentience, focusing on pain experience....
Crump et al. provide eight criteria for evaluating sentience in decapods, with scope for for applica...
The criteria for determining animal sentience proposed in the target article are sensible but they l...
Crump et al.’s framework is a powerful tool designed to assist decisions on the ethical treatment of...
The criteria proposed by Crump et al. are based on various cognitive roles associated with sentience...