Politicians Public Discourse and Vocabulary

Komunikacija je dio života, temeljni socijalni proces. Budući da je ona nezaobilazna u svakom trenutku našeg života, potrebno joj je posvetiti podosta pažnje, kako bi je uspješno savladali, time si olakšali privatni kao i poslovni život. Ovaj završni rad bavi se jednim segmentom u širokom spektru komunikacije, retorikom i javnim nastupom u političara. Pokazano je koja znanja je potrebno steći, koje zamke izbjeći, kako se uspješno nositi sa sobom, da bi u konačnici ostvarili svoj cilj, prenijeli poruku publici. Na put smo krenuli od općega prema pojedinačnom, dakle od neverbalnog, povijesnog, preko verbalnog, nadalje naglašavamo svrhu retorike i umijeće javnog govorništva, prolazimo kroz nezaobilazni povijesni slijed, prema izgradnji uspješnog govora, retorike u politici, te važnih govora velikana koji su promijenili povijest, naglašavamo umijeće političkog komuniciranja, te psihologiju mase, tajne govorništva, nadalje govorništvo u Hrvata gdje ističemo važne i zaslužne ličnosti naših prostora. Na kraju rada je analiza dvaju političara koji su uspjeli biti u vrhu političkog života svoga vremena, zahvaljujući inteligenciji, obrazovanju, možda čak i karizmi. Da li je to tako, svatko može na svoj način protumačiti, ali zar nije svatko svoj kreator misli?Communication is a part of everyday life, a basic social process. As it is inevitable in every moment of our lives, it is necessary to dedicate a lot of attention to it, as we can successfully achieve it, and by that to make our private life and business life much easier. This thesis is taking into consideration just one segment in the wide spectrum of communication, rhetoric and public appearance of politicians. It is shown which skills are needed to be acquired, which traps needed to be avoided and how to deal with yourself successfully, so ultimately the desired goal should be achieved and we can transfer the message to the audience. We took our way from general to individual, so from non-verbal and historical, up to verbal. Further on, we are highlighting the purpose of rhetoric and the skills of public speaking, we're going through the unavoidable historical sequence, aiming to build a successful speech and rhetoric in politics, as well as important speeches of remarkable people who changed the history. We are highlighting the skills of political communication, as well as the psychology of the masses, the secrets of oratory and oratory at Croats, where we're emphasizing important and remarkable persons from our area. At the end of the thesis, there's an analysis of two politicans who succeeded to be at the top of political life at their era, thanks to the intelligence, education, maybe even to the charisma. Is that so, everyone can interpret on its own way, but isn't everyone creator of its own mind