Purpose: This randomized, controlled study evaluated the 2-year clinical performance of two flowable resin composites performed with a universal adhesive in two etching modes for restoring non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Methods: One hundred NCCLs were restored with two flowable composites (Charisma Opal Flow and G-aenial Universal Flo) and a universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal) with two etching modes (self-etch and etch&rinse) in a random order. The restorations were evaluated for retention, marginal adaptation, anatomic form, marginal discoloration, surface texture and secondary caries (modified USPHS criteria) at baseline, and after 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: The clinical success for retention, surface texture and secondar...
Background: To answer the PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss equal for SEE and SE approa...
OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 3-year clinical performance of a...
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of composite restor...
Purpose: The objective of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the six-month...
Objective: To evaluate the performances of two different universal adhesives applied with different ...
Purpose: To clinically evaluate the 3-year performance of a one-bottle dentin adhesive in the restor...
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of two different microhybrid resin composites in non...
Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the pe...
Purpose: To evaluate the retention and marginal staining of restorations placed in non-carious cervi...
Objective: To answer the following PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss, marginal discolor...
Objective: To answer the following PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss, marginal discolor...
Objective: To evaluate non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with different adhesion strateg...
OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 3-year clinical performance of a...
Objective: To answer the following PICOS question: \u201cIs the risk of retention loss, marginal dis...
Background: To answer the PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss equal for SEE and SE approa...
Background: To answer the PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss equal for SEE and SE approa...
OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 3-year clinical performance of a...
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of composite restor...
Purpose: The objective of this double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the six-month...
Objective: To evaluate the performances of two different universal adhesives applied with different ...
Purpose: To clinically evaluate the 3-year performance of a one-bottle dentin adhesive in the restor...
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of two different microhybrid resin composites in non...
Objective: The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the pe...
Purpose: To evaluate the retention and marginal staining of restorations placed in non-carious cervi...
Objective: To answer the following PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss, marginal discolor...
Objective: To answer the following PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss, marginal discolor...
Objective: To evaluate non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) restored with different adhesion strateg...
OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 3-year clinical performance of a...
Objective: To answer the following PICOS question: \u201cIs the risk of retention loss, marginal dis...
Background: To answer the PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss equal for SEE and SE approa...
Background: To answer the PICOS question: “Is the risk of retention loss equal for SEE and SE approa...
OBJECTIVES: This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 3-year clinical performance of a...
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year clinical performance of composite restor...