With its decision in Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, the Supreme Court has, for the third time in twelve years, rendered a significant if not landmark ruling on the act of state doctrine. Before 1964 the Court had not decided a case involving that doctrine for more than twenty years. During that intervening period many questions were raised in the learned writings on the subject, and the controversial decision, Bernstein v. N. V. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche, etc., was decided by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York
The doctrine of sovereign immunity\u27 prohibits the courts from assuming jurisdiction of a foreign ...
Municipal courts are frequently required to adjudicate the status of rights affected by foreign law ...
Sovereign Immunity and Act of State -- A Foreign Sovereign instituting Suit in a United States Court...
International comity demands that one sovereign ordinarily recognize the legitimacy of the acts of a...
The United States Supreme Court recently decided, in Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, that Ameri...
The act of state doctrine poses a serious obstacle for plaintiffs seeking redress in United States c...
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino (1964)has recently been called undoubtedly one of the most impo...
The ability of the United States courts to adjudicate claims against foreign sovereigns is limited b...
The United States Supreme Court framed a unique legal doctrine on foreign seizure of American-owned ...
In retaliation for a reduction of its sugar quota by the United States the Cuban government national...
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions involving the act of state doctrine. T...
This article will review the traditional approach to nationalization and assess the new theories in ...
Act of State Doctrine does not Preclude Inquiry by United States Court into Alleged Repudiation by a...
This Comment examines the evolution of the act of state doctrine in a commercial context, with speci...
Constitutional Law--Grandfather Clause in International Emergency Economic Powers Act Permits the Pr...
The doctrine of sovereign immunity\u27 prohibits the courts from assuming jurisdiction of a foreign ...
Municipal courts are frequently required to adjudicate the status of rights affected by foreign law ...
Sovereign Immunity and Act of State -- A Foreign Sovereign instituting Suit in a United States Court...
International comity demands that one sovereign ordinarily recognize the legitimacy of the acts of a...
The United States Supreme Court recently decided, in Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, that Ameri...
The act of state doctrine poses a serious obstacle for plaintiffs seeking redress in United States c...
Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino (1964)has recently been called undoubtedly one of the most impo...
The ability of the United States courts to adjudicate claims against foreign sovereigns is limited b...
The United States Supreme Court framed a unique legal doctrine on foreign seizure of American-owned ...
In retaliation for a reduction of its sugar quota by the United States the Cuban government national...
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court\u27s recent decisions involving the act of state doctrine. T...
This article will review the traditional approach to nationalization and assess the new theories in ...
Act of State Doctrine does not Preclude Inquiry by United States Court into Alleged Repudiation by a...
This Comment examines the evolution of the act of state doctrine in a commercial context, with speci...
Constitutional Law--Grandfather Clause in International Emergency Economic Powers Act Permits the Pr...
The doctrine of sovereign immunity\u27 prohibits the courts from assuming jurisdiction of a foreign ...
Municipal courts are frequently required to adjudicate the status of rights affected by foreign law ...
Sovereign Immunity and Act of State -- A Foreign Sovereign instituting Suit in a United States Court...