The evolution of computer technology has launched questions regarding the proper scope of protection for computer software. The European Community (EC) recently adopted a Council Directive on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs (the Directive), which protects computer software under the copyright paradigm. The path to final adoption of the Directive, however, was marked by debates between diametrically opposed lobbying groups regarding the propriety of a reverse engineering exception to the exclusive right of reproduction. This Note discusses the lobbying efforts that led to a compromise and analyzes the Directive through a comparison to United States law. Next, the Note analyzes a look and feel infringement suit under the Direc...
Since the enactment of Directive 91/250 EEC, software developers - especially SMEs - have adopted co...
Since the enactment of Directive 91/250 EEC, software developers – especially SMEs – have adopted co...
The maxim, that copyright law does not protect ideas, is frequently challenged when the established ...
This Note compares the reverse engineering exception in the Directive with U.S. copyright law. Part ...
Long awaited – if not feared – in the computer industry, where its elaboration had evoked heated deb...
The rapid evolution of computer technology raises difficult questions about the scope of protection ...
This paper attempts to analyse the legal protection of software in Europe and reviews the current le...
The best method for protection of computer software has been a topic of debate and considerable cont...
Section I of this article explores the different avenues of intellectual property protection present...
Computer programs (more generally, software) have become an essential part of the contemporary (soci...
This book is a study of how computer programs have challenged the thinking about and the actual use ...
This article referes to the evolution of EEC’s reglementation of software judicial protection and it...
After 20 years of silence, two recent references from the Czech Republic (Bezpečnostní softwarová as...
The United States blazed the trail in giving copyright protection for software. Until just recently,...
With regard to continuous legal uncertainty in the field of software patenting inEurope it is approp...
Since the enactment of Directive 91/250 EEC, software developers - especially SMEs - have adopted co...
Since the enactment of Directive 91/250 EEC, software developers – especially SMEs – have adopted co...
The maxim, that copyright law does not protect ideas, is frequently challenged when the established ...
This Note compares the reverse engineering exception in the Directive with U.S. copyright law. Part ...
Long awaited – if not feared – in the computer industry, where its elaboration had evoked heated deb...
The rapid evolution of computer technology raises difficult questions about the scope of protection ...
This paper attempts to analyse the legal protection of software in Europe and reviews the current le...
The best method for protection of computer software has been a topic of debate and considerable cont...
Section I of this article explores the different avenues of intellectual property protection present...
Computer programs (more generally, software) have become an essential part of the contemporary (soci...
This book is a study of how computer programs have challenged the thinking about and the actual use ...
This article referes to the evolution of EEC’s reglementation of software judicial protection and it...
After 20 years of silence, two recent references from the Czech Republic (Bezpečnostní softwarová as...
The United States blazed the trail in giving copyright protection for software. Until just recently,...
With regard to continuous legal uncertainty in the field of software patenting inEurope it is approp...
Since the enactment of Directive 91/250 EEC, software developers - especially SMEs - have adopted co...
Since the enactment of Directive 91/250 EEC, software developers – especially SMEs – have adopted co...
The maxim, that copyright law does not protect ideas, is frequently challenged when the established ...