From Ideology to Pragmatism: China\u27s Position on Humanitarian Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era

This Article fills a gap in the literature by examining in depth China\u27s state practice and official pronouncements in respect of nine post-Cold War cases typically cited by academics when considering the international legal status of humanitarian intervention. The majority of today\u27s commentary and scholarship holds that the People\u27s Republic of China\u27s position on sovereignty and intervention remains inflexible and absolutist, much as it was for the PRC\u27s first four decades. This Article contends that this view is outdated and overly simplistic: while China continues to champion a strong conception of state sovereignty in interstate relations, it has signaled a shift from an ideological insistence on noninterference toward a more pragmatic approach to humanitarian crises. In particular, this can be seen in China\u27s willingness to acquiesce in and even actively support multilateral humanitarian interventions that obtain both Security Council authorization and target state consent, as well as in China\u27s willingness to use its growing economic and diplomatic leverage to help secure consent to intervention