Against Separation

In 1802, in a letter to the Danbury Baptist Association, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the First Amendment had the effect of building a wall of separation between Church & State. As it happens, when Congress drafted the First Amendment in 1789, Jefferson was enjoying Paris. Nonetheless, his words about separation are often taken as an authoritative interpretation of the First Amendment\u27s establishment clause. Indeed, in the 1947 Everson v. Board of Education decision, the Supreme Court quoted Jefferson\u27s pronouncement to justify its conclusion that the First Amendment guarantees a separation of church and state. Not only the justices but also vast numbers of other Americans have come to understand their religious freedom in terms of Jefferson\u27s phrase. As a result, Jefferson\u27s words often seem more familiar than the words of the First Amendment itself. At stake is the character of religious freedom in the United States. In particular, there is a danger that lingering separationist notions will continue to affect the interpretation of the First Amendment\u27s establishment clause. This clause provides, among other things, that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. These words say nothing about separation of church and state, and therefore notwithstanding the claims made on behalf of separation, there is reason to believe it is not the religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitution