I think it is useful to search for a theory that has as one of its justifications its superior fit with either the case law or the fundamental commitments and shared understandings of the political community, preferably with both. So even if someone were to convince me that she has in hand a normatively superior theory of free speech, whether grounded in the commitment to democracy or otherwise, I would still be interested in what Professors Post and Weinstein are trying to do
This article offers a comprehensive and critical analysis of Eric Heinze’s book Hate Speech and Demo...
The following essay is excerpted and adapted from The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Polit...
Free speech disputes have broken out on numerous college and university campuses. In several inciden...
There are very nearly as many (if not more) rationales for freedom of speech as there are books and ...
In scholarship, one writes with the overt aspiration to persuade but much more primitively with the ...
It is a pleasure to participate in this symposium on democratic legitimacy and hate speech regulatio...
1 online resource (PDF, pages 661-674)Part of Symposium: Hate Speech and Political Legitimac
In scholarship, one writes with the overt aspiration to persuade but much more primitively with the ...
Paul Bender has interesting and telling points to make, but a good many of them do not concern the p...
This article aims to develop a ground for freedom of speech that combines two justifications – democ...
1 online resource (PDF, pages 651-659)Part of Symposium: Hate Speech and Political Legitimac
Democratic theory is currently divided into two opposing schools: the Participatory, whose test of d...
The aim of the thesis is to rebut the dominant autonomy-based defence of hate speech within a libera...
Professor Rahman gives his thoughts and opinions on the impact of Citizens\u27 United v. FEC and the...
Some of our best and most influential constitutional scholars have recently revived the view that th...
This article offers a comprehensive and critical analysis of Eric Heinze’s book Hate Speech and Demo...
The following essay is excerpted and adapted from The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Polit...
Free speech disputes have broken out on numerous college and university campuses. In several inciden...
There are very nearly as many (if not more) rationales for freedom of speech as there are books and ...
In scholarship, one writes with the overt aspiration to persuade but much more primitively with the ...
It is a pleasure to participate in this symposium on democratic legitimacy and hate speech regulatio...
1 online resource (PDF, pages 661-674)Part of Symposium: Hate Speech and Political Legitimac
In scholarship, one writes with the overt aspiration to persuade but much more primitively with the ...
Paul Bender has interesting and telling points to make, but a good many of them do not concern the p...
This article aims to develop a ground for freedom of speech that combines two justifications – democ...
1 online resource (PDF, pages 651-659)Part of Symposium: Hate Speech and Political Legitimac
Democratic theory is currently divided into two opposing schools: the Participatory, whose test of d...
The aim of the thesis is to rebut the dominant autonomy-based defence of hate speech within a libera...
Professor Rahman gives his thoughts and opinions on the impact of Citizens\u27 United v. FEC and the...
Some of our best and most influential constitutional scholars have recently revived the view that th...
This article offers a comprehensive and critical analysis of Eric Heinze’s book Hate Speech and Demo...
The following essay is excerpted and adapted from The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Polit...
Free speech disputes have broken out on numerous college and university campuses. In several inciden...