Kajian Yuridis Bagi Personil Polri Yang Menyalahgunakan Narkoba Dalam Perspektif Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika (Studi Kasus Di Polda Sumatera Utara)

AbstrakPenyidikan dan pelaksanan hukuman rehabilitasi yang diputuskan oleh Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri yang ada di Sumatera Utara terhadap pecandu narkotika masih terhitung sangat sedikit bila dibandingkan dengan hukuman penjara. Pihak penyidik Polri cendrung memproses tersangka pencandu narkotika, penyalahguna dan korban penyalahgunaan narkotika untuk dihukum penjara daripada direhabilitiasi. Oknum polisi harus melaksanakan sidang kode etik kepolisian, dan jika terbukti bersalah dengan dijatuhi hukuman diatas 5 (lima) tahun, maka oknum polisi tersebut dapat langsung diberhentikan dengan tidak hormat dari instansinya atau dicopot jabatannya dan jika hukuman yang dijatuhkan kurang dari 5 (lima) tahun maka oknum polisi tersebut masih bisa dipertimbangkan, apakah hanya diberikan sanksi disiplin atau dimutilasi ke suatu tempat yang jauh dari narkoba. Proses penegakan kode etik profesi kepolisian terhadap anggota kepolisian yang terjerat kasus pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika akan diperiksa dan bila terbukti akan dijatuhi sanksi. Penjatuhan sanksi disiplin serta sanksi atas pelanggaran kode etik tidak menghapus tuntutan pidana terhadap anggota polisi yang bersangkutan. Oknum polisi yang menggunakan narkotika tetap akan diproses hukum walaupun telah menjalani sanksi disiplin dan sanksi pelanggaran kode etik. Oknum polisi disangkakan menggunakan narkotika dan diproses penyidikan tetap harus dipandang tidak bersalah sampai terbukti melalui putusan pengadilan yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (asas praduga tidak bersalah) sebagaimana diatur Pasal 8 ayat (1) UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Namun pada kenyataannya, penegakan kode etik profesi kepolisian terhadap anggota kepolisian yang terjerat kasus pidana penyalahgunaan narkotika belum terlaksana dengan baik. Bagi aparat yang berwenang mengadili dalam pelanggaran kode etik yang dilakukan oleh anggota polisi seharusnya lebih tegas dalam menindak polisi yang terjerat kasus penggunaan narkotika dengan sesegera mungkin direhabilitasi, bukanlah harus dipecat atau dipenjara.Kata Kunci : Penyalahgunaan Narkoba, Rehabilitasi, Tindak Pidana AbstractThe investigation and implementation of rehabilitation sentences decided by the Panel of Judges of the District Court in North Sumatra for narcotics addicts is still very small compared to prison sentences. Police investigators tend to process suspected drug addicts, abusers and victims of narcotics abuse to be sentenced to prison rather than rehabilitation. Police officers must carry out a hearing on the police code of ethics, and if proven guilty by being sentenced to more than 5 (five) years, then the police officer can be immediately dismissed with disrespect from his agency or removed from his position and if the sentence imposed is less than 5 (five) years then the police officer can still be considered, whether only given disciplinary sanctions or mutilated to a place far from drugs. The process of enforcing the code of ethics of the police profession against members of the police who are caught in a criminal case of narcotics abuse will be examined and if proven, they will be subject to sanctions. The imposition of disciplinary sanctions and sanctions for violations of the code of ethics does not remove criminal charges against the police officers concerned. Police officers who use narcotics will still be prosecuted even though they have undergone disciplinary sanctions and sanctions for violating the code of ethics. Police officers who are suspected of using narcotics and subject to investigation must still be considered innocent until proven through a court decision that has permanent legal force (the principle of presumption of innocence) as stipulated in Article 8 paragraph (1) of Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. However, in reality, the enforcement of the police professional code of ethics against members of the police who are entangled in criminal cases of narcotics abuse has not been carried out properly. For those who are authorized to prosecute violations of the code of ethics committed by members of the police, they should be more firm in taking action against police who are caught in narcotics use cases and should be rehabilitated as soon as possible, not fired or imprisoned.Keywords: Drug Abuse, Rehabilitation, Crim