Add to ORKG"This rather remarkable pamphlet is issued by the author in this country, although the original title-page shows it to be a reprint from the Calcutta Review of February, 1926, published by the Calcutta University Press.
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
"The title of the book sounds, and really is, technical… The book comprises seven essays or chapters...
The study of history dates back to the classical times and its contributions to the development of h...
Science is generally not thought of as being deeply historiographical. Although it is clear that sci...
What is the history of science? How has it changed over the course of the twentieth century? And wha...
What is the history of science? How has it changed over the course of the twentieth century? And wha...
History of science is, we are told, an important subject for study. Its rise in recent years to beco...
© 1969 David J. Wilkinson“History,” said Francis Bacon, “maketh men wise.”, and whether the historia...
About the book: The history of the sciences and the history of the book are complementary, and ther...
I see two major themes arising from Mark Erickson’s (2010) provocative question, ‘Why should I read ...
History is different from the other social sciences. Nine contrasting qualities have produced a str...
History is different from the other social sciences. Nine contrasting qualities have produced a str...
Some puzzles in human life are universal and cut across generations. That is why some of the very is...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
"The title of the book sounds, and really is, technical… The book comprises seven essays or chapters...
The study of history dates back to the classical times and its contributions to the development of h...
Science is generally not thought of as being deeply historiographical. Although it is clear that sci...
What is the history of science? How has it changed over the course of the twentieth century? And wha...
What is the history of science? How has it changed over the course of the twentieth century? And wha...
History of science is, we are told, an important subject for study. Its rise in recent years to beco...
© 1969 David J. Wilkinson“History,” said Francis Bacon, “maketh men wise.”, and whether the historia...
About the book: The history of the sciences and the history of the book are complementary, and ther...
I see two major themes arising from Mark Erickson’s (2010) provocative question, ‘Why should I read ...
History is different from the other social sciences. Nine contrasting qualities have produced a str...
History is different from the other social sciences. Nine contrasting qualities have produced a str...
Some puzzles in human life are universal and cut across generations. That is why some of the very is...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...
History of science and philosophy of science are not perfectly complementary disciplines. Several im...