Add to ORKGWith this event – a Symposium on Abner Greene’s Against Obligation2 and Michael Seidman’s On Constitutional Disobedience3 – we continue our Boston University Law Review series of symposia on significant recent books in law. The distinctive format is to pick two books that join issue on an important topic, to invite the author of each book to write an essay on the other book, and to invite several Boston University School of Law faculty members to write an essay on one or both books
What is the nature of the US Constitution? How ought it to be interpreted? Ronald Dworkin famously a...
Review of Lawrence Lessig\u27s Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American ...
This symposium contribution critically examines Louis Seidman’s book Constitutional Disobedience (...
With this event – a Symposium on Abner Greene’s Against Obligation2 and Michael Seidman’s On Constit...
The central claim of Abner Greene’s Against Obligation appears to be that the federal government sho...
In his provocative, courageous, and original new book, Against Obligation: The Multiple Sources of ...
Proper constitutional interpretation takes both text and past practice as its object: Lawyers and ju...
With this event – A Symposium on Jack Balkin’s Living Originalism and David Strauss’s The Living Con...
What is the question of fidelity a question about? The topic of our Symposium, Fidelity in Constitu...
The crucial idea in constitutional law is legitimacy; the crucial idea in jurisprudence is justifica...
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fid...
The study of constitutional law clearly presupposes a theory of interpretation. All too often, howev...
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fid...
This third volume about legal interpretation focuses on the interpretation of a constitution, most s...
Should courts interpret the Constitution as they interpret statutes? This question has been answered...
What is the nature of the US Constitution? How ought it to be interpreted? Ronald Dworkin famously a...
Review of Lawrence Lessig\u27s Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American ...
This symposium contribution critically examines Louis Seidman’s book Constitutional Disobedience (...
With this event – a Symposium on Abner Greene’s Against Obligation2 and Michael Seidman’s On Constit...
The central claim of Abner Greene’s Against Obligation appears to be that the federal government sho...
In his provocative, courageous, and original new book, Against Obligation: The Multiple Sources of ...
Proper constitutional interpretation takes both text and past practice as its object: Lawyers and ju...
With this event – A Symposium on Jack Balkin’s Living Originalism and David Strauss’s The Living Con...
What is the question of fidelity a question about? The topic of our Symposium, Fidelity in Constitu...
The crucial idea in constitutional law is legitimacy; the crucial idea in jurisprudence is justifica...
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fid...
The study of constitutional law clearly presupposes a theory of interpretation. All too often, howev...
It is a privilege to participate in this exchange with Bruce Frohnen concerning our books. In my Fid...
This third volume about legal interpretation focuses on the interpretation of a constitution, most s...
Should courts interpret the Constitution as they interpret statutes? This question has been answered...
What is the nature of the US Constitution? How ought it to be interpreted? Ronald Dworkin famously a...
Review of Lawrence Lessig\u27s Fidelity and Constraint: How the Supreme Court Has Read the American ...
This symposium contribution critically examines Louis Seidman’s book Constitutional Disobedience (...