Add to ORKGLawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett\u27s excellent book, Constitutional Originalism: A Debate, calls to mind a famous book in political philosophy, J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams\u27s Utilitarianism: For and Against.\u27 Both works pair two spirited yet fair-minded scholars in a constructive debate between two competing views prevalent in their fields. Originalism has a reasonable, programmatic, and inclusive proponent in Solum, and living constitutionalism has a capable, pragmatic, and effective champion in Bennett
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...
One might easily paint a picture in which the central question debated in constitutional jurispruden...
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...
Book review: Constitutional Originalism: a Debate. By Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett, 2011....
Book review: Constitutional Originalism: a Debate. By Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett, 2011....
Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett\u27s excellent book, Constitutional Originalism: A Debate, c...
Constitutions can be seen either as defensive mechanisms for protecting liberty, as suggested by the...
Book review: Constitutional Originalism: a Debate. By Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett, 2011....
Constitutions can be seen either as defensive mechanisms for protecting liberty, as suggested by the...
The debate over constitutional Originalism continues to spark scholarly controversy. The most recent...
Reviewing Frank B. Cross, The Failed Promise of Originalism; Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to A...
The conflict between various versions of originalism and living constitutionalism has defined th...
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...
One might easily paint a picture in which the central question debated in constitutional jurispruden...
Debates over “originalism” have been a central focus of contemporary constitutional theory for three...
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...
One might easily paint a picture in which the central question debated in constitutional jurispruden...
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...
Book review: Constitutional Originalism: a Debate. By Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett, 2011....
Book review: Constitutional Originalism: a Debate. By Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett, 2011....
Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett\u27s excellent book, Constitutional Originalism: A Debate, c...
Constitutions can be seen either as defensive mechanisms for protecting liberty, as suggested by the...
Book review: Constitutional Originalism: a Debate. By Lawrence B. Solum and Robert W. Bennett, 2011....
Constitutions can be seen either as defensive mechanisms for protecting liberty, as suggested by the...
The debate over constitutional Originalism continues to spark scholarly controversy. The most recent...
Reviewing Frank B. Cross, The Failed Promise of Originalism; Mark A. Graber, A New Introduction to A...
The conflict between various versions of originalism and living constitutionalism has defined th...
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...
One might easily paint a picture in which the central question debated in constitutional jurispruden...
Debates over “originalism” have been a central focus of contemporary constitutional theory for three...
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...
One might easily paint a picture in which the central question debated in constitutional jurispruden...
Originalists routinely argue that originalism is the only coherent and legitimate theory of constitu...