Dworkin\u27s new book provides a comprehensive argument for his important and provocative view, which is more systematically developed than before. Although much in it is anticipated by his previous publications, a great deal is new and many elements have been recast. The innovative nature of Dworkin\u27s work can now be more fully appreciated and appraised. Neither Dworkin\u27s theory of law as integrity nor its designated rivals pragmatism and conventionalism will be found on the standard charts of jurisprudence. In fact, Dworkin seems to reinterpret not only the theoretical alternatives but the enterprise of legal philosophy itself. This article will focus on the more general aspects of Dworkin\u27s position, especially those that ...
In this paper the author addresses Ronald Dworkin’s work and assesses his legacy to legal, moral and...
Historically law students have struggled to understand why they should learn legal theory. They woul...
No one has done more in the last twenty years to revitalize debates about how judges should and do d...
Dworkin\u27s new book provides a comprehensive argument for his important and provocative view, whic...
At the outset of his most recent book Ronald Dworkin summarizes with remarkable concision the main l...
At the outset of his most recent book Ronald Dworkin summarizes with remarkable concision the main l...
The purposes of this study are both expository and critical. The expository purposes are: first, to ...
If we consider Ronald Dworkin\u27s essay, The Model of Rules \u27, to be the first expression of h...
These excellent volumes show both the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary and serious Dworkin s...
A complete theory of law, writes Ronald Dworkin, tells us what law is and what it ought to be. The c...
A complete theory of law, writes Ronald Dworkin, tells us what law is and what it ought to be. The c...
En este trabajo se evalúa el impacto sobre la filosofía del derecho contemporánea de la obra de Rona...
In this essay I endorse the conclusion reached earlier by Jeffrey Goldsworthy that Ronald Dworkin wa...
If we consider Ronald Dworkin\u27s essay, The Model of Rules \u27, to be the first expression of h...
In this paper the author addresses Ronald Dworkin’s work and assesses his legacy to legal, moral and...
In this paper the author addresses Ronald Dworkin’s work and assesses his legacy to legal, moral and...
Historically law students have struggled to understand why they should learn legal theory. They woul...
No one has done more in the last twenty years to revitalize debates about how judges should and do d...
Dworkin\u27s new book provides a comprehensive argument for his important and provocative view, whic...
At the outset of his most recent book Ronald Dworkin summarizes with remarkable concision the main l...
At the outset of his most recent book Ronald Dworkin summarizes with remarkable concision the main l...
The purposes of this study are both expository and critical. The expository purposes are: first, to ...
If we consider Ronald Dworkin\u27s essay, The Model of Rules \u27, to be the first expression of h...
These excellent volumes show both the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary and serious Dworkin s...
A complete theory of law, writes Ronald Dworkin, tells us what law is and what it ought to be. The c...
A complete theory of law, writes Ronald Dworkin, tells us what law is and what it ought to be. The c...
En este trabajo se evalúa el impacto sobre la filosofía del derecho contemporánea de la obra de Rona...
In this essay I endorse the conclusion reached earlier by Jeffrey Goldsworthy that Ronald Dworkin wa...
If we consider Ronald Dworkin\u27s essay, The Model of Rules \u27, to be the first expression of h...
In this paper the author addresses Ronald Dworkin’s work and assesses his legacy to legal, moral and...
In this paper the author addresses Ronald Dworkin’s work and assesses his legacy to legal, moral and...
Historically law students have struggled to understand why they should learn legal theory. They woul...
No one has done more in the last twenty years to revitalize debates about how judges should and do d...