The objection to citation of foreign law in U.S. Supreme Court decisions is bad history and bad law. First, let me briefly review how the objection has come to prominence recently. On June 26, 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Lawrence v. Texas, striking down a same-sex sodomy statute. Justice Antonin Scalia, in the course of his dissenting opinion, wrote that the majority\u27s citation of foreign law was meaningless dicta, [d]angerous dicta. \u27 He added that the majority\u27s opinion was the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda
As Judge Messitte\u27s essay demonstrates, recent references in Supreme Court decisions to non-U.S. ...
This (35 pp.) essay appears as a contribution to a law review symposium on the work of Harvard Law S...
In July 2003, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a six to three decision\u27 tha...
We must never forget that it is a Constitution for the United States of America that we are expoundi...
Building on the controversy over foreign citations in domestic courts, this article reflects on the ...
One can be forgiven for wondering if the debate about references to foreign law in U.S. court opinio...
Building on the controversy over foreign citations in domestic courts, this article reflects on the ...
Judicial citation of foreign law worries many people, including justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, ...
The use of foreign law and unratified international treaty law by U.S. courts in U.S. constitutional...
Since 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court has consulted contemporary foreign legal judgments to help interp...
This article contributes to the current heated debate regarding the extent to which the U.S. Supreme...
My goal in this Essay is simply to lay out the criticisms of the use of non-U.S. law in constitution...
In this Article, Professor Parrish explores the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s use of for...
Why might a court refer to non-U.S. law? Justice Stephen Breyer\u27s pragmatic defense of the practi...
As Judge Messitte\u27s essay demonstrates, recent references in Supreme Court decisions to non-U.S. ...
This (35 pp.) essay appears as a contribution to a law review symposium on the work of Harvard Law S...
In July 2003, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a six to three decision\u27 tha...
We must never forget that it is a Constitution for the United States of America that we are expoundi...
Building on the controversy over foreign citations in domestic courts, this article reflects on the ...
One can be forgiven for wondering if the debate about references to foreign law in U.S. court opinio...
Building on the controversy over foreign citations in domestic courts, this article reflects on the ...
Judicial citation of foreign law worries many people, including justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, ...
The use of foreign law and unratified international treaty law by U.S. courts in U.S. constitutional...
Since 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court has consulted contemporary foreign legal judgments to help interp...
This article contributes to the current heated debate regarding the extent to which the U.S. Supreme...
My goal in this Essay is simply to lay out the criticisms of the use of non-U.S. law in constitution...
In this Article, Professor Parrish explores the legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s use of for...
Why might a court refer to non-U.S. law? Justice Stephen Breyer\u27s pragmatic defense of the practi...
As Judge Messitte\u27s essay demonstrates, recent references in Supreme Court decisions to non-U.S. ...
This (35 pp.) essay appears as a contribution to a law review symposium on the work of Harvard Law S...
In July 2003, the United States Supreme Court ruled in a six to three decision\u27 tha...