This United States (US) Supreme Court case, argued on October 23, 1902 and decided on January 5, 1903, held that the US Congress does have the right to pass legislation that changes the terms of tribal treaties without the necessary consent of the tribes with whom the treaties were made. The petitioner in this case, Lone Wolf (representing members of the Kiowa, Comanche, and Apache tribes) appealed a decision from the court of appeals from the District of Columbia. The petitioner claimed that the Medicine Lodge treaty of 1867 with the Kiowa and Comanche tribes was violated when Congress passed bills modifying the treaty without the consent of three fourths of the adult male members of the tribes, per the specifications of the treaty. In the...
This thesis will examine how the United States Congress abdicated their plenary power over Indian af...
Three Affiliated Tribes v. Wold Engineering is a case that forced the United States (US) Supreme Cou...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, argued on October 23, 1902 and decided on January 5, 190...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, submitted October 23, 1902 and decided December 1, 1902,...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
Clark\u27s unique approach in Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock allows him to go beyond the initial examination...
Tribal sovereignty and self-government are essential to Native American cultural survival. Current l...
Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. [2912] Extended over tribal courts of the Five Civilized Tribes; ...
The aspect of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock that I want to explore in this essay I will label congressiona...
In 1974 the Crow Tribal Council enacted a resolution restricting reservation hunting and fishing to ...
In 1978 the Supreme Court in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe held that the retained sovereignty ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The concept of tribal sovereignty frequently conflicts with that of congressional plenary power, dep...
This Article is the first of a two-part investigation into the Indian law doctrine of reservation di...
This thesis will examine how the United States Congress abdicated their plenary power over Indian af...
Three Affiliated Tribes v. Wold Engineering is a case that forced the United States (US) Supreme Cou...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, argued on October 23, 1902 and decided on January 5, 190...
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, submitted October 23, 1902 and decided December 1, 1902,...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
Clark\u27s unique approach in Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock allows him to go beyond the initial examination...
Tribal sovereignty and self-government are essential to Native American cultural survival. Current l...
Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. [2912] Extended over tribal courts of the Five Civilized Tribes; ...
The aspect of Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock that I want to explore in this essay I will label congressiona...
In 1974 the Crow Tribal Council enacted a resolution restricting reservation hunting and fishing to ...
In 1978 the Supreme Court in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe held that the retained sovereignty ...
This article is a content analysis examination of 107 federal court cases involving American Indian ...
The concept of tribal sovereignty frequently conflicts with that of congressional plenary power, dep...
This Article is the first of a two-part investigation into the Indian law doctrine of reservation di...
This thesis will examine how the United States Congress abdicated their plenary power over Indian af...
Three Affiliated Tribes v. Wold Engineering is a case that forced the United States (US) Supreme Cou...
A summary judgment decision is ordinarily not casenote material. But the denial of summary judgment ...