Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Verstek Dalam Perbuatan Wanprestasi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Debitur Terhadap PT.BPR Putra Riau Mandiri Kampar Berdasarkan Perkara No.67/PDT.G/2016/PN.BKN

This research is a civil lawsuit No.67 / PDT.G / 2016 / PN.BKN. It is initiated with a credit loan agreement aimed at working capital of Rp.45,000,000 (forty five million) on June 14, 2013 in the agreement deed kerdit no.418 between the Plaintiff and Defendant I and Defendant II, where during the agreement the Defendant I and Defendant II did not carry out their obligations and the plaintiff also submitted a subpoena to the defendant to pay off his debt but there was no good deed from the defendant. So as to obtain their rights, the Plaintiff represented by their attorney shall file a lawsuit against Defendant I and Defendant II on the basis of a breach of contract. The main problem in this study is How the Verstek Decision on defaults in case No.67 / PDT.G / 2016 / PN.BKN and How the judges considerations in deciding Verstek decision in case No.67 / PDT.G / 2016 / PN. BKN. This research method is normative legal research by means of a typical study that is by studying the case ruling No.67 / PDT.G / 2016 / PN.BKN. while its nature is descriptive nature, the writer tries to give a detailed description of this decision. From the results of the research obtained from the conclusion, that the Verstek's decision on defaults in case No.67 / PDT.G / 2016 / PN.BKN is a decision that discusses the defaults committed by the debtor against PT. BPR Putra Riau Mandiri Kampar. Where the creditor as the Plaintiff and the Debtor as the Defendant. And the plaintiff's lawsuit in his petitum requested that the panel of judges grant all of their claims including the application to place seizures of material collateral, in the form of a plot of land and the building along with what was on it, with evidence of a compensation statement. Therefore, because of this, the Panel of Judges examined the subject matter and considered it, resulting in case decision No.67 / PDT.G / 2016 / PN.BKN by stating that Defendants I and Defendant II had been legally and appropriately summoned according to the law, granting the lawsuit the plaintiff for a part of Verstek, and stated that Defendant I and Defendant II have carried out a Default / breach of contract. and punish Defendant I and Defendant II for paying the debts dated 15 July 2016 to the Plaintiff Rp.145,264,606 (one hundred forty five million two hundred sixty four thousand six hundred six rupiah) which will continue to increase until the debt is repaid and reject the claim of the plaintiff for the most part