This Insight examines the judgment delivered by the Court of Justice on 25 January 2018 in the case F (C-473/16). This case concerns a very sensitive topic, as it relates to the admissibility of an expert’s report and projective personality tests to assess the existence of a specific ground up-on which international protection can be asked, namely sexual orientation. The Court lays down important criteria in a constant attempt to ensure the respect of the applicant’s fundamental rights. The F judgement is likely to give an impetus to a new legal approach on the matter, even if some points of the Court’s legal reasoning are not fully convincing
In the case of HJ and HT v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Supreme Court of the Unit...
Since the 1990s, the European Union (EU) has slowly developed an increasingly sophisticated body of ...
This thesis investigates an increasingly important topic in the European Union (EU). I analyze chall...
This Insight examines the judgment delivered by the Court of Justice on 25 January 2018 in the case ...
Credibility of the asylum applicant’s assertions within any member state of the European Union with...
This paper covers the problems and dynamics that LGBTQI (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Queer and Intersex)...
Commentary on judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union on case F v Bevándorlási és Áll...
The aim of this article is to describe and analyze the main practices that the Greek Asylum Service ...
This Comment discusses the current European legal framework for determining whether sexual minority ...
A common issue of applications of international protection is the lack of physical evidence to subst...
The article examines the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (case A, B, C v. Sta...
This article addresses the concern that decision-making in sexual orientation or gender identity (SO...
Asylum seekers making claims relating to their sexual orientation and gender identity often face unf...
Hungary has been in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons for quite a while. From legislation targ...
Since the 1990s, the European Union (EU) has slowly developed an increasingly sophisticated body of ...
In the case of HJ and HT v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Supreme Court of the Unit...
Since the 1990s, the European Union (EU) has slowly developed an increasingly sophisticated body of ...
This thesis investigates an increasingly important topic in the European Union (EU). I analyze chall...
This Insight examines the judgment delivered by the Court of Justice on 25 January 2018 in the case ...
Credibility of the asylum applicant’s assertions within any member state of the European Union with...
This paper covers the problems and dynamics that LGBTQI (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Queer and Intersex)...
Commentary on judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union on case F v Bevándorlási és Áll...
The aim of this article is to describe and analyze the main practices that the Greek Asylum Service ...
This Comment discusses the current European legal framework for determining whether sexual minority ...
A common issue of applications of international protection is the lack of physical evidence to subst...
The article examines the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (case A, B, C v. Sta...
This article addresses the concern that decision-making in sexual orientation or gender identity (SO...
Asylum seekers making claims relating to their sexual orientation and gender identity often face unf...
Hungary has been in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons for quite a while. From legislation targ...
Since the 1990s, the European Union (EU) has slowly developed an increasingly sophisticated body of ...
In the case of HJ and HT v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Supreme Court of the Unit...
Since the 1990s, the European Union (EU) has slowly developed an increasingly sophisticated body of ...
This thesis investigates an increasingly important topic in the European Union (EU). I analyze chall...