Plasma concentrations of advanced glycation end-products and colorectal cancer risk in the EPIC study

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Carcinogenesis following peer review. The version of record Aglago, Schalkwijk, Freisling, Fedirko, Hughes, Jiao, Dahm, Olsen, Tjønneland, Katzke, Johnson, Schulze, Aleksandrova, Masala, Sieri, Simeon, Tumino, Macciotta, Bueno-De-Mesquita, Skeie, Gram, Sandanger, Jakszyn, Sánchez, Amiano, Colorado-Yohar, Barricarte, Perez-Cornago, Mayén, Weiderpass, Gunter, Heath, Jenab. Plasma concentrations of advanced glycation end-products and colorectal cancer risk in the EPIC study. Carcinogenesis. 2021;42(5):705-713 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgab026.Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are a heterogeneous group of compounds formed by the non-enzymatic reaction between amino acids and reducing sugars, or dicarbonyls as intermediate compounds. Experimental studies suggest that AGEs may promote colorectal cancer, but prospective epidemiologic studies are inconclusive. We conducted a case–control study nested within a large European cohort. Plasma concentrations of three protein-bound AGEs—Nε-(carboxy-methyl)lysine (CML), Nε-(carboxy-ethyl)lysine (CEL) and Nδ-(5-hydro-5-methyl-4-imidazolon-2-yl)-ornithine (MG-H1)—were measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in baseline samples collected from 1378 incident primary colorectal cancer cases and 1378 matched controls. Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using conditional logistic regression for colorectal cancer risk associated with CML, CEL, MG-H1, total AGEs, and [CEL+MG-H1: CML] and [CEL:MG-H1] ratios. Inverse colorectal cancer risk associations were observed for CML (OR comparing highest to lowest quintile, ORQ5 versus Q1 = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.27–0.59), MG-H1 (ORQ5 versus Q1 = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.53–1.00) and total AGEs (OR Q5 versus Q1 = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37–0.73), whereas no association was observed for CEL. A higher [CEL+MG-H1: CML] ratio was associated with colorectal cancer risk (ORQ5 versus Q1 = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.31–2.79). The associations observed did not differ by sex, or by tumour anatomical sub-site. Although individual AGEs concentrations appear to be inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk, a higher ratio of methylglyoxal-derived AGEs versus those derived from glyoxal (calculated by [CEL+MG-H1: CML] ratio) showed a strong positive risk association. Further insight on the metabolism of AGEs and their dicarbonyls precursors, and their roles in colorectal cancer development is needed