This chapter first discusses some pre-orders which are the infinite horizon versions of classic utilitarianism and the leximin principles. There are two different ways in which leximin and utilitarianism have been extended to the infinite horizon context. The chapter uses some simple examples to illustrate how these different approaches compare with one another, and argues informally that one method is perhaps better than the other. Second, it shows that Separability along with a weak version of the Pareto axiom implies that any social welfare ordering of infinite utility streams must exhibit time preference over a limited class of comparisons
The axiom translation invariance consists in asserting the invariance of the ranking of two utility ...
[EN]We study two related versions of the no-impatience postulate in the context of transitive and re...
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comWe introduce a new Pareto-type criterio...
This paper revisits Diamond’s classical impossibility result regarding the ordering of infinite util...
A long tradition in welfare economics and moral philosophy, dating back at least to Sidgwick(1907) i...
The history of the axiomatic approach to the ranking of infinite streams starts with Koopmans' (1960...
The question of whether future utility should be discounted has a long history, dating back to early...
First version, December 18, 2007; Current version, August 21, 2008This paper studies the extensions ...
Various extensions of the leximin order to the infinite dimensional setting have been suggested. The...
We study two related versions of the no-impatience postulate in the context of transitive and reflex...
[EN]Invited talk at the Eighth Italian-Spanish Conference on General Topology and its Applications
The existence of a Paretian and finitely anonymous ordering in the set of infinite utility streams i...
August 12, 2006This paper is an outgrowth of our joint research which was conducted as a part of the...
There exists a utilitarian tradition a la Sidgwick of treating equal genera-tions equally. Diamond s...
In this work we analyse social welfare relations on sets of infinite utility streams that verify var...
The axiom translation invariance consists in asserting the invariance of the ranking of two utility ...
[EN]We study two related versions of the no-impatience postulate in the context of transitive and re...
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comWe introduce a new Pareto-type criterio...
This paper revisits Diamond’s classical impossibility result regarding the ordering of infinite util...
A long tradition in welfare economics and moral philosophy, dating back at least to Sidgwick(1907) i...
The history of the axiomatic approach to the ranking of infinite streams starts with Koopmans' (1960...
The question of whether future utility should be discounted has a long history, dating back to early...
First version, December 18, 2007; Current version, August 21, 2008This paper studies the extensions ...
Various extensions of the leximin order to the infinite dimensional setting have been suggested. The...
We study two related versions of the no-impatience postulate in the context of transitive and reflex...
[EN]Invited talk at the Eighth Italian-Spanish Conference on General Topology and its Applications
The existence of a Paretian and finitely anonymous ordering in the set of infinite utility streams i...
August 12, 2006This paper is an outgrowth of our joint research which was conducted as a part of the...
There exists a utilitarian tradition a la Sidgwick of treating equal genera-tions equally. Diamond s...
In this work we analyse social welfare relations on sets of infinite utility streams that verify var...
The axiom translation invariance consists in asserting the invariance of the ranking of two utility ...
[EN]We study two related versions of the no-impatience postulate in the context of transitive and re...
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comWe introduce a new Pareto-type criterio...