The City of Madison enacted an ordinance prohibiting the sale within the municipality\u27s jurisdiction of milk not pasteurized and bottled within five miles of the city\u27s central square. Plaintiff, an Illinois corporation engaged in distributing milk and milk products in Illinois and Wisconsin, had its pasteurization plant in Illinois, approximately sixty-five miles from Madison. After it had been denied a permit to distribute milk in Madison, plaintiff brought an action for a declaratory judgment as to the validity of the ordinance. The ordinance was upheld by the Wisconsin Supreme Court as a reasonable exercise of the municipality\u27s police power. On appeal to the United States Supreme Court, held, reversed, Justices Black, Douglas ...
As a natural concomitant of the prevailing laissez-faire economic philosophy, a strong feeling again...
Since Gibbons v. Ogden, courts have wrestled with the problem of state legislation which affects int...
In the period covered by this supplementary article, the Supreme Court has decided a case or two a y...
Pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, conferring on the Secretary of Agricul...
Plaintiff, a Massachusetts manufacturing corporation operating on a mail order-f.o.b. delivery basis...
In accordance with a scheme of federal ship inspection, appellant possessed certificates which permi...
Pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, conferring on the Secretary of Agricul...
Plaintiff, who was engaged in the manufacture of renovated butter from packing stock butter, brought...
Appellant, a Missouri corporation, was domiciled in Illinois and engaged in interstate trucking of c...
On being refused a license, a carrier operating under the provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Ac...
Petitioner who was engaged in a wholly intrastate activity, the bakery business, at Santa Rosa, New ...
Recent decisions have revealed a growing rift in the Supreme Court on the question of the effect of ...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
Appellee, an Illinois corporation engaged in manufacturing and selling candy within the state of Ill...
Petitioner who was engaged in a wholly intrastate activity, the bakery business, at Santa Rosa, New ...
As a natural concomitant of the prevailing laissez-faire economic philosophy, a strong feeling again...
Since Gibbons v. Ogden, courts have wrestled with the problem of state legislation which affects int...
In the period covered by this supplementary article, the Supreme Court has decided a case or two a y...
Pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, conferring on the Secretary of Agricul...
Plaintiff, a Massachusetts manufacturing corporation operating on a mail order-f.o.b. delivery basis...
In accordance with a scheme of federal ship inspection, appellant possessed certificates which permi...
Pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, conferring on the Secretary of Agricul...
Plaintiff, who was engaged in the manufacture of renovated butter from packing stock butter, brought...
Appellant, a Missouri corporation, was domiciled in Illinois and engaged in interstate trucking of c...
On being refused a license, a carrier operating under the provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Ac...
Petitioner who was engaged in a wholly intrastate activity, the bakery business, at Santa Rosa, New ...
Recent decisions have revealed a growing rift in the Supreme Court on the question of the effect of ...
The appellant (defendant in the case below) and certain of its members were found guilty of unfair l...
Appellee, an Illinois corporation engaged in manufacturing and selling candy within the state of Ill...
Petitioner who was engaged in a wholly intrastate activity, the bakery business, at Santa Rosa, New ...
As a natural concomitant of the prevailing laissez-faire economic philosophy, a strong feeling again...
Since Gibbons v. Ogden, courts have wrestled with the problem of state legislation which affects int...
In the period covered by this supplementary article, the Supreme Court has decided a case or two a y...