Defendant was tried for two counts of felony. After twenty-seven minutes of deliberation the jury was unable to agree on either count, and the court asked the parties whether they would accept a majority verdict. Counsel for the defendant, after consulting with his client, consented, as did the United States Attorney. The jury found defendant guilty on both counts by a majority of nine to three and ten to two respectively. The court ordered a verdict to be filed and imposed a sentence. On appeal, held, reversed. A unanimous verdict is the inescapable element of due process and cannot be waived under any circumstances. Aside from the disability springing from the due process concept, the mandatory wording of rule 31(a) of the Federal Rul...
In a prosecution for murder, a special venire was summoned and a list thereof served on the accused....
One John Memolo was convicted of tax evasion in the District Court of the United States for the Midd...
Petitioner was summoned to appear as a witness before one of Oakland County\u27s judges who was then...
Defendant was tried for two counts of felony. After twenty-seven minutes of deliberation the jury wa...
Until the rendition of the Supreme Court\u27s lengthy opinion in Patton v. United States the consequ...
Plaintiff instituted this action for breach of contract and defendant counterclaimed. Neither party ...
Defendant was tried for the crime of driving a car while intoxicated. After the jury was instructed ...
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the Harrison Narcotics Act in the Federal District Court fo...
Until the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, non-unanimous jury verdicts were cons...
Defendant was convicted of selling whiskey and imprisoned in the county jail. After the time for app...
Until the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, non-unanimous jury verdicts were cons...
This Article proposes that the rule of unanimity is not an essential element of justice in a crimina...
In United States v. United States District Court, the Ninth Circuit held that the circumstances of a...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that where a trial judge sua sponte declares a mistrial w...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
In a prosecution for murder, a special venire was summoned and a list thereof served on the accused....
One John Memolo was convicted of tax evasion in the District Court of the United States for the Midd...
Petitioner was summoned to appear as a witness before one of Oakland County\u27s judges who was then...
Defendant was tried for two counts of felony. After twenty-seven minutes of deliberation the jury wa...
Until the rendition of the Supreme Court\u27s lengthy opinion in Patton v. United States the consequ...
Plaintiff instituted this action for breach of contract and defendant counterclaimed. Neither party ...
Defendant was tried for the crime of driving a car while intoxicated. After the jury was instructed ...
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the Harrison Narcotics Act in the Federal District Court fo...
Until the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, non-unanimous jury verdicts were cons...
Defendant was convicted of selling whiskey and imprisoned in the county jail. After the time for app...
Until the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, non-unanimous jury verdicts were cons...
This Article proposes that the rule of unanimity is not an essential element of justice in a crimina...
In United States v. United States District Court, the Ninth Circuit held that the circumstances of a...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that where a trial judge sua sponte declares a mistrial w...
The defendant was convicted of negligent homicide as the result of a collision between his car and a...
In a prosecution for murder, a special venire was summoned and a list thereof served on the accused....
One John Memolo was convicted of tax evasion in the District Court of the United States for the Midd...
Petitioner was summoned to appear as a witness before one of Oakland County\u27s judges who was then...