In accordance with statutory provisions, the city commissioners of Atlantic City advertised for bids for certain public improvements. Plaintiff submitted a sealed bid accompanied by a deposit of $5,000, as required by the advertisement, to guarantee execution of the contract if it were the successful bidder. When the bids were opened, plaintiff was the lowest bidder by a considerable margin. Investigation disclosed that an appreciable error had been made in the calculation of its bid, however, and before any official action had been taken, plaintiff advised the city commission of the mistake and withdrew the bid. Nevertheless, the contract was subsequently awarded to plaintiff, and on its refusal to perform, the $5,000 was declared forfeite...
ln 1940 defendant leased his property to the plaintiff for ten years with an option to purchase for ...
Plaintiff and defendant exchanged several letters concerning six contiguous lots which defendant own...
Defendant contracted with plaintiff to grade an athletic field. The contract required all questions ...
Plaintiff, city housing authority, invited bids for construction work reserving the right to reject ...
A disappointed low bidder on a federal government contract brought suit to recover lost profits and ...
Although the procedure for bidding contracts is clear, there has been significant litigation challen...
Plaintiff, a bidder on a government contract, attempted to withdraw its bid upon discovering that it...
The receiver of an insolvent bank received from one Lorensen bids of $4,500 for the building and $50...
Defendant store published two newspaper advertisements offering for sale on successive Saturdays lim...
Can a municipality be liable in quasi contract? What recourse is available to the individual or corp...
The Office of Surplus Property accepted defendant\u27s bid for a quantity of sodium carbonate. Submi...
In recent years, bidders aggrieved by municipal tender awards are increasingly resorting to Section ...
In Washington, bidding procedures are controlled by a number of statutes. These have been set out in...
Monclova v. Arnett, 3 N.Y.2d 33, 163 N.Y.S.2d 652 (1957); Emily Shops v. Interstate Truck Line, 2 N....
While plaintiff\u27s shopping center was under construction, defendant second-class municipality pre...
ln 1940 defendant leased his property to the plaintiff for ten years with an option to purchase for ...
Plaintiff and defendant exchanged several letters concerning six contiguous lots which defendant own...
Defendant contracted with plaintiff to grade an athletic field. The contract required all questions ...
Plaintiff, city housing authority, invited bids for construction work reserving the right to reject ...
A disappointed low bidder on a federal government contract brought suit to recover lost profits and ...
Although the procedure for bidding contracts is clear, there has been significant litigation challen...
Plaintiff, a bidder on a government contract, attempted to withdraw its bid upon discovering that it...
The receiver of an insolvent bank received from one Lorensen bids of $4,500 for the building and $50...
Defendant store published two newspaper advertisements offering for sale on successive Saturdays lim...
Can a municipality be liable in quasi contract? What recourse is available to the individual or corp...
The Office of Surplus Property accepted defendant\u27s bid for a quantity of sodium carbonate. Submi...
In recent years, bidders aggrieved by municipal tender awards are increasingly resorting to Section ...
In Washington, bidding procedures are controlled by a number of statutes. These have been set out in...
Monclova v. Arnett, 3 N.Y.2d 33, 163 N.Y.S.2d 652 (1957); Emily Shops v. Interstate Truck Line, 2 N....
While plaintiff\u27s shopping center was under construction, defendant second-class municipality pre...
ln 1940 defendant leased his property to the plaintiff for ten years with an option to purchase for ...
Plaintiff and defendant exchanged several letters concerning six contiguous lots which defendant own...
Defendant contracted with plaintiff to grade an athletic field. The contract required all questions ...