Juries must answer to questions of fact and judges to questions of law. This is the fundamental maxim acknowledged by the Constitution. When no fact question is present, no right to jury trial in a civil suit exists, and the constitutional guaranty is, therefore, not violated by the exercise of control by the court in keeping the jury to determination of questions of fact or in keeping it within the bounds of reason. One of the most important and often used methods of control is the directed verdict, whereby the court peremptorily instructs the jury to bring in a verdict for one of the parties and then enters judgment accordingly
In Nebraska a directed verdicts based on circumstantial evidence leading to an inference presents a ...
Should constitutional provisions for jury trial apply to contempts committed outside the physical pr...
One of the most intriguing topics of current conversation among today\u27s experienced, as well as i...
Federal district court judges have several mechanisms for controlling civil jury functions. One mech...
The federal government brought an action to restrain the United States Gypsum Company and thirteen o...
In recent decades, the potential for factual disagreement among convicting jurors has emerged as a p...
Plaintiff\u27s cause of action arose under the federal Merchant Marine Act, which grants a right to ...
Criminal juries have an uncertain task. While we tout their constitutional role\u27 in our justice s...
Jury practice in the state and federal courts evolved dramatically in the nineteenth and early twent...
In federal civil litigation, decisionmaking power is shared by juries, trial courts, and appellate c...
Plaintiff was severely burned by the explosion of a can of liquid bug killer allegedly sold to him...
This action was brought in a South Carolina state court and removed to the federal district court on...
It is probably no exaggeration to state that many cases are won or lost on the jury selection. Every...
This Article seeks to assess the treatment of civil jury verdicts by the federal courts of appeals d...
An action for declaratory relief was brought in a federal district court to determine the validity o...
In Nebraska a directed verdicts based on circumstantial evidence leading to an inference presents a ...
Should constitutional provisions for jury trial apply to contempts committed outside the physical pr...
One of the most intriguing topics of current conversation among today\u27s experienced, as well as i...
Federal district court judges have several mechanisms for controlling civil jury functions. One mech...
The federal government brought an action to restrain the United States Gypsum Company and thirteen o...
In recent decades, the potential for factual disagreement among convicting jurors has emerged as a p...
Plaintiff\u27s cause of action arose under the federal Merchant Marine Act, which grants a right to ...
Criminal juries have an uncertain task. While we tout their constitutional role\u27 in our justice s...
Jury practice in the state and federal courts evolved dramatically in the nineteenth and early twent...
In federal civil litigation, decisionmaking power is shared by juries, trial courts, and appellate c...
Plaintiff was severely burned by the explosion of a can of liquid bug killer allegedly sold to him...
This action was brought in a South Carolina state court and removed to the federal district court on...
It is probably no exaggeration to state that many cases are won or lost on the jury selection. Every...
This Article seeks to assess the treatment of civil jury verdicts by the federal courts of appeals d...
An action for declaratory relief was brought in a federal district court to determine the validity o...
In Nebraska a directed verdicts based on circumstantial evidence leading to an inference presents a ...
Should constitutional provisions for jury trial apply to contempts committed outside the physical pr...
One of the most intriguing topics of current conversation among today\u27s experienced, as well as i...