While employed by defendant, plaintiff suffered severe bums and received compensation for a permanent partial disability under the applicable workmen\u27s compensation act. He then brought an action for damages for disfigurement, not compensable under the act, on the theory that acceptance of statutory compensation did not deprive him of his common law remedy for injuries not within the scope of the act. Held, the statutory remedy is exclusive; plaintiff cannot recover for associated injuries outside the act. Morgan v. Ray L. Smith & Son, Inc., (D.C. Kan. 1948) 79 F. Supp. 971
Petitioner, a laborer in a railroad section gang, was assigned to burn weeds near a railroad track. ...
In Eliker v. D.H. Merritt & Sons, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that workmen\u27s compensation sho...
The earliest workmen\u27s compensation statutes in this country typically provided compensation only...
At common law any person who wrongfully injures another, intentionally or negligently, is liable to ...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Plaintiff, an employee in defendant\u27s mill, helped to organize a baseball team among defendant\u2...
Plaintiff, a dairy worker, suffered an infection in her left arm as a result of submitting to a Wass...
Covers cases on a wife\u27s loss of consortium under destruction of common law remedies, on the limi...
Industrial injuries involving intentional torts or situations where the workmen\u27s compensation st...
The purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which the personal injury action can now be ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the exclusive remedy provision of the Pennsylvania Work...
An employee who suffered from high blood pressure and hardening of the arteries was employed by defe...
When workmen\u27s compensation was first introduced a half century ago, it was felt necessary to cus...
Plaintiff received benefits under the schedule provisions of the Michigan workmen\u27s compensation ...
Petitioner, a laborer in a railroad section gang, was assigned to burn weeds near a railroad track. ...
In Eliker v. D.H. Merritt & Sons, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that workmen\u27s compensation sho...
The earliest workmen\u27s compensation statutes in this country typically provided compensation only...
At common law any person who wrongfully injures another, intentionally or negligently, is liable to ...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Plaintiff, an employee in defendant\u27s mill, helped to organize a baseball team among defendant\u2...
Plaintiff, a dairy worker, suffered an infection in her left arm as a result of submitting to a Wass...
Covers cases on a wife\u27s loss of consortium under destruction of common law remedies, on the limi...
Industrial injuries involving intentional torts or situations where the workmen\u27s compensation st...
The purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which the personal injury action can now be ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the exclusive remedy provision of the Pennsylvania Work...
An employee who suffered from high blood pressure and hardening of the arteries was employed by defe...
When workmen\u27s compensation was first introduced a half century ago, it was felt necessary to cus...
Plaintiff received benefits under the schedule provisions of the Michigan workmen\u27s compensation ...
Petitioner, a laborer in a railroad section gang, was assigned to burn weeds near a railroad track. ...
In Eliker v. D.H. Merritt & Sons, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that workmen\u27s compensation sho...
The earliest workmen\u27s compensation statutes in this country typically provided compensation only...