Every individual in the United States who purchases and registers a vehicle is involved with the automobile insurance industry. Like many other types of insurance, there is much longstanding debate regarding the difficulty associated with receiving the benefits one has paid for. This debate is particularly complicated in Connecticut. Unlike many other jurisdictions that have a no-fault automobile insurance system, Connecticut relies on a tort-based liability system for determining compensation for an injured party. In Connecticut, when a driver or passenger is injured in a car accident as a result of the actions of another driver, damages are recovered by proving legal liability. Connecticut courts currently allow a defendant and their insu...
It is not often that a legislative event and a happenstance of life converge almost simultaneously u...
Since the 1980s, tort damages for pain and suffering have excited hue and cry. Twenty-three states c...
Plaintiff insured the defendant against loss on his car due to collision, paid its liability when th...
Every individual in the United States who purchases and registers a vehicle is involved with the aut...
Plaintiff, having recovered a judgment against insured defendant for injuries sustained in an automo...
A split of authority exists among the few states which have decided the issue In jurisdictions permi...
Under an automobile liability policy, the defendant insurer paid the plaintiff, on his judgment agai...
Except in California, uninsured motorist statutes do not provide for any specified period within whi...
A 1958 New York statute requires the organization of an Indemnification Corporation by companies sel...
Today, automobile accidents constitute a major source of actions at law for negligence. Some of thes...
It was the contention of the defendant-appellant insurers that their liability was limited in both i...
Automobile liability insurance is mandatory for drivers in all states, so as to provide for an avail...
The drivers of two automobiles involved in a collision were insured against liability for damages by...
American law has long afforded the state and its subdivisions of government an immunity from liabili...
This Note will demonstrate that the Mahler court\u27s decision will lead to inefficient results, bec...
It is not often that a legislative event and a happenstance of life converge almost simultaneously u...
Since the 1980s, tort damages for pain and suffering have excited hue and cry. Twenty-three states c...
Plaintiff insured the defendant against loss on his car due to collision, paid its liability when th...
Every individual in the United States who purchases and registers a vehicle is involved with the aut...
Plaintiff, having recovered a judgment against insured defendant for injuries sustained in an automo...
A split of authority exists among the few states which have decided the issue In jurisdictions permi...
Under an automobile liability policy, the defendant insurer paid the plaintiff, on his judgment agai...
Except in California, uninsured motorist statutes do not provide for any specified period within whi...
A 1958 New York statute requires the organization of an Indemnification Corporation by companies sel...
Today, automobile accidents constitute a major source of actions at law for negligence. Some of thes...
It was the contention of the defendant-appellant insurers that their liability was limited in both i...
Automobile liability insurance is mandatory for drivers in all states, so as to provide for an avail...
The drivers of two automobiles involved in a collision were insured against liability for damages by...
American law has long afforded the state and its subdivisions of government an immunity from liabili...
This Note will demonstrate that the Mahler court\u27s decision will lead to inefficient results, bec...
It is not often that a legislative event and a happenstance of life converge almost simultaneously u...
Since the 1980s, tort damages for pain and suffering have excited hue and cry. Twenty-three states c...
Plaintiff insured the defendant against loss on his car due to collision, paid its liability when th...