In Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov and Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney General) (the “Admin Law Trilogy”), the Supreme Court of Canada embarked on an ambitious revamp of the Canadian law of judicial review of administrative decisions. The Court’s lead decision, Vavilov, has broad implications for Canadian public law. Specifically, in this comment, I explore the Court’s introduction of an important, new contextual factor to the reasonableness analysis — that of the impact of an impugned decision on those affected by it, and particularly, those with existing vulnerabilities
Public law scholarship in the common law tradition often aims at elucidating a connection between la...
The 2007-2008 term was a landmark year in Canadian administrative law. The Supreme Court of Canada d...
This paper examines the surprising resurgence of the Bill of Rights in procedural fairness cases bef...
In Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov and Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney G...
In Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, the Supreme Court of Canada attempte...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
When an important case is appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, interested observers focus their ...
This article examines two key administrative law decisions of the 2008-2009 Supreme Court of Canada ...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
This project develops an interpretive account of the single reasonableness standard as it has evolve...
This thesis surveys the last three decades of Canadian jurisprudence on the standards of review appl...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s Charter jurisprudence often resembles a seesaw. The Court will tilt to...
Rendu en décembre 2019, l’arrêt Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration) c. Vavilov é...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
Concentrating on Canadian experience, specifically litigation under the Canadian Charter of Rights a...
Public law scholarship in the common law tradition often aims at elucidating a connection between la...
The 2007-2008 term was a landmark year in Canadian administrative law. The Supreme Court of Canada d...
This paper examines the surprising resurgence of the Bill of Rights in procedural fairness cases bef...
In Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov and Bell Canada v. Canada (Attorney G...
In Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, the Supreme Court of Canada attempte...
In Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick, the Supreme Court re-examined its approach to judicial review of admin...
When an important case is appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, interested observers focus their ...
This article examines two key administrative law decisions of the 2008-2009 Supreme Court of Canada ...
Although the Supreme Court of Canada’s seminal decision in Dunsmuir v. New Brunswick has now been ci...
This project develops an interpretive account of the single reasonableness standard as it has evolve...
This thesis surveys the last three decades of Canadian jurisprudence on the standards of review appl...
The Supreme Court of Canada’s Charter jurisprudence often resembles a seesaw. The Court will tilt to...
Rendu en décembre 2019, l’arrêt Canada (Ministre de la Citoyenneté et de l’Immigration) c. Vavilov é...
This thesis examines the concept of “deference” in relation to judicial review of administrative dec...
Concentrating on Canadian experience, specifically litigation under the Canadian Charter of Rights a...
Public law scholarship in the common law tradition often aims at elucidating a connection between la...
The 2007-2008 term was a landmark year in Canadian administrative law. The Supreme Court of Canada d...
This paper examines the surprising resurgence of the Bill of Rights in procedural fairness cases bef...