Add to ORKGThis article considers the Supreme Court’s two Aboriginal law decisions of 2018. They are not ground-breaking: the first applies existing Aboriginal law jurisprudence, and the second limits the application of existing jurisprudence. Neither case says anything fundamental about the nature of reconciliation or the honour of the Crown. When seen together, however, they show a court that is invested in reconciliation but wanting to limit its role in achieving reconciliation
On August 15, 1991, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its decision in Bear Island Foundation v...
In Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, the Supreme Court addressed two main issues: (1) the stan...
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia calls for re-ex...
This article considers the Supreme Court’s two Aboriginal law decisions of 2018. They are not ground...
This article confronts the contention that the Crown’s fiduciary obligations are incompatible with A...
In Manitoba Metis Federation, the Supreme Court of Canada makes a valuable contribution to our under...
The judiciary has repeatedly called on First Nations and the Crown not to tax the institutional comp...
Simply put, Crown liability doctrine in Crown/Aboriginal Law in Canada is a mess. Demonstrably, ther...
On November 18, 2004 the Supreme Court of Canada ( the Court ) released its two landmark decisions o...
In this article, we argue for the importance of the geographic underpinnings of the concepts of “the...
The honour of the Crown is recognized as a Canadian constitutional principle that is essential to re...
In the text that follows, I start by explaining how Canada\u27s behaviour in the Tsilhqot\u27in liti...
The Supreme Court of Canada\u27s jurisprudence on constitutionally protected Aboriginal rights filte...
In R. v. Desautel, decided 23 April 2021, a majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held, for the fi...
The Supreme Court of Canada delivered three decisions in 2002 involving the Aboriginal peoples of Ca...
On August 15, 1991, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its decision in Bear Island Foundation v...
In Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, the Supreme Court addressed two main issues: (1) the stan...
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia calls for re-ex...
This article considers the Supreme Court’s two Aboriginal law decisions of 2018. They are not ground...
This article confronts the contention that the Crown’s fiduciary obligations are incompatible with A...
In Manitoba Metis Federation, the Supreme Court of Canada makes a valuable contribution to our under...
The judiciary has repeatedly called on First Nations and the Crown not to tax the institutional comp...
Simply put, Crown liability doctrine in Crown/Aboriginal Law in Canada is a mess. Demonstrably, ther...
On November 18, 2004 the Supreme Court of Canada ( the Court ) released its two landmark decisions o...
In this article, we argue for the importance of the geographic underpinnings of the concepts of “the...
The honour of the Crown is recognized as a Canadian constitutional principle that is essential to re...
In the text that follows, I start by explaining how Canada\u27s behaviour in the Tsilhqot\u27in liti...
The Supreme Court of Canada\u27s jurisprudence on constitutionally protected Aboriginal rights filte...
In R. v. Desautel, decided 23 April 2021, a majority of the Supreme Court of Canada held, for the fi...
The Supreme Court of Canada delivered three decisions in 2002 involving the Aboriginal peoples of Ca...
On August 15, 1991, the Supreme Court of Canada handed down its decision in Bear Island Foundation v...
In Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, the Supreme Court addressed two main issues: (1) the stan...
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia calls for re-ex...