Peer review is a process to help ensure publication of high-quality research. Manuscripts submitted for publication are evaluated by others with similar content or methodological expertise, and the feedback is used by editors to determine suitability for publication. Participation in the peer review process may help improve agile teaching as well as contribute to the faculty scholar roles of professional service. This paper describes the process of peer review, including criteria for becoming a reviewer and how to perform a review
This research contributes to the knowledge on academics’ attitudes towards peer review, through an i...
This research contributes to the knowledge on academics’ attitudes towards peer review, through an i...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
Graduate students develop their researcher identity through their written academic work, not only vo...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
The purpose of peer review is to uphold the integrity of the publishing journal, improve upon resear...
Peer review in the academic arena is the evaluation of a scholar or a scholarly work by peers— typic...
Introduction: Peer review, a cornerstone of academia, promotes rigor and relevance in scientificpubl...
The context for this study is a multidisciplinary collaboration of six faculty members using peer re...
This workshop explores theoretical questions and practical strategies for how to develop peer review...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
The practice of peer review is essential to ensure academic quality of articles published in profess...
This research contributes to the knowledge on academics’ attitudes towards peer review, through an i...
This research contributes to the knowledge on academics’ attitudes towards peer review, through an i...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...
Graduate students develop their researcher identity through their written academic work, not only vo...
Peer review is one way scholarly journals can maintain rigor and increase the quality of published m...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
The purpose of peer review is to uphold the integrity of the publishing journal, improve upon resear...
Peer review in the academic arena is the evaluation of a scholar or a scholarly work by peers— typic...
Introduction: Peer review, a cornerstone of academia, promotes rigor and relevance in scientificpubl...
The context for this study is a multidisciplinary collaboration of six faculty members using peer re...
This workshop explores theoretical questions and practical strategies for how to develop peer review...
The strength and vitality of publications in our pro-fession and pharmaceutical science disciplines ...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Aims: To provide an overview of the peer review process, its various types, selection of peer revie...
The practice of peer review is essential to ensure academic quality of articles published in profess...
This research contributes to the knowledge on academics’ attitudes towards peer review, through an i...
This research contributes to the knowledge on academics’ attitudes towards peer review, through an i...
<div>Peer review is a process in which academic research is subjected to critical evaluation by othe...