Can acquirees in business combinations adopt the same new basis of accounting the acquirer uses? The Financial Accounting Standards Board recently published a consensus position from the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF), ASU 2014-17, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting, to answer this question. The standard establishes new and common guidance on applying pushdown accounting for public and nonpublic acquirees. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) simultaneously released Staff Accounting Bulletin 115 to rescind the existing guidance for public acquirees. This blog entry summarizes the main features of the new standard
The perennial controversy in business combinations accounting and its dialectic with stakeholders’ i...
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. The adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in ...
SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations, includes significant changes to the accounting and disclosure ...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-08, Pu...
Push-down Accounting has gained great popularity over the last decade with the resurrection of acqui...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently issued Statement of Financial Accountin...
This blog entry highlights the transition requirements for ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with ...
The accounting for business combinations is a very important area, therefore it needs a high quality...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 141(R) in December 2007 to replace SFAS 141. An...
The business combinations are a long-running controversial accounting issue. Two methods of accounti...
Two innovative features of the new California Corporations Code touch upon the subject of accounting...
Following G4+1 recommendations issued after a meeting in 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Bo...
Revenue is a crucial number to users of financial statements in assessing an entity’s financial perf...
For many years, two methods existed alongside each other in the USA to account for business combinat...
The perennial controversy in business combinations accounting and its dialectic with stakeholders’ i...
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. The adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in ...
SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations, includes significant changes to the accounting and disclosure ...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-08, Pu...
Push-down Accounting has gained great popularity over the last decade with the resurrection of acqui...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently issued Statement of Financial Accountin...
This blog entry highlights the transition requirements for ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with ...
The accounting for business combinations is a very important area, therefore it needs a high quality...
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS 141(R) in December 2007 to replace SFAS 141. An...
The business combinations are a long-running controversial accounting issue. Two methods of accounti...
Two innovative features of the new California Corporations Code touch upon the subject of accounting...
Following G4+1 recommendations issued after a meeting in 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Bo...
Revenue is a crucial number to users of financial statements in assessing an entity’s financial perf...
For many years, two methods existed alongside each other in the USA to account for business combinat...
The perennial controversy in business combinations accounting and its dialectic with stakeholders’ i...
© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. The adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in ...
SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations, includes significant changes to the accounting and disclosure ...