This panel will discuss which theories of constitutional interpretation render the Constitution most effective and resilient in the face of change, technological and otherwise. Hugh Hewitt, Professor of Law, Fowler School of Law Michael Rappaport, Professor of Law and Director, Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism, University of San Diego Mark Tushnet, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School Rebecca Zietlow, Distinguished University Professor and the Charles W. Fornoff Professor of Law and Value, University of Toledo College of Law Moderator: Professor Kurt Eggert, Director of the Alona Cortese Elder Law Center at the Fowler School of La
Is an independent judiciary consistent with a commitment to popular sovereignty? Can a body dedicate...
Understanding American constitutionalism can be advanced by distinguishing three matrices of its pec...
Julie Nice, Herbst Foundation Professor of Law, University of San Francisco School of Law Jon Davids...
This panel will examine how emergent technologies and other trends will result in new constitutional...
For much of its history, the interpretation of the United States Constitution presupposed judges see...
A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism is the first text to study the entirety of American...
It is commonly understood by the American populous that the Constitution is the law of the land, we ...
If our law requires originalism in constitutional interpretation, then that would be a good reason t...
Part of symposium: The Interpretation/Construction Distinction in Constitutional Law: Annual Meeti...
This panel will focus on outside sources, such as state and foreign constitutions, in comparison wit...
Modern constitutions are built on a constitutive tension, insomuch as they aspire to establish “a fi...
The debate over constitutional Originalism continues to spark scholarly controversy. The most recent...
Constitutional Law is “tough law.” It is tough to master – tough to teach and tough to learn. Ther...
The attraction of an originalist approach to constitutional interpretation is understandable. It is ...
2013 Notre Dame Law Review SymposiumThe Evolution of Theory: Discerning the Catalysts of Constitutio...
Is an independent judiciary consistent with a commitment to popular sovereignty? Can a body dedicate...
Understanding American constitutionalism can be advanced by distinguishing three matrices of its pec...
Julie Nice, Herbst Foundation Professor of Law, University of San Francisco School of Law Jon Davids...
This panel will examine how emergent technologies and other trends will result in new constitutional...
For much of its history, the interpretation of the United States Constitution presupposed judges see...
A New Introduction to American Constitutionalism is the first text to study the entirety of American...
It is commonly understood by the American populous that the Constitution is the law of the land, we ...
If our law requires originalism in constitutional interpretation, then that would be a good reason t...
Part of symposium: The Interpretation/Construction Distinction in Constitutional Law: Annual Meeti...
This panel will focus on outside sources, such as state and foreign constitutions, in comparison wit...
Modern constitutions are built on a constitutive tension, insomuch as they aspire to establish “a fi...
The debate over constitutional Originalism continues to spark scholarly controversy. The most recent...
Constitutional Law is “tough law.” It is tough to master – tough to teach and tough to learn. Ther...
The attraction of an originalist approach to constitutional interpretation is understandable. It is ...
2013 Notre Dame Law Review SymposiumThe Evolution of Theory: Discerning the Catalysts of Constitutio...
Is an independent judiciary consistent with a commitment to popular sovereignty? Can a body dedicate...
Understanding American constitutionalism can be advanced by distinguishing three matrices of its pec...
Julie Nice, Herbst Foundation Professor of Law, University of San Francisco School of Law Jon Davids...