A variety of interpreters have argued that Kant construes the animality of human beings as ‘transformed’, in some sense, through the possession of rationality. I argue that this interpretation admits of multiple readings and that it is either wrong, or doesn’t result in the conclusion for which its proponents argue. I also explain the sense in which rationality nevertheless significantly differentiates human beings from other animals
The essay investigates whether from a Kantian perspective, we can gain insights for a deeper underst...
While growing empirical evidence suggests a continuity between human and non-human psychology, many ...
Both in historical debates and in recent discussions, the Guise of the Good Thesis represents a genu...
A variety of interpreters have argued that Kant construes the animality of human beings as ‘transfor...
Kant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically distinct e...
20 pagesKant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically di...
In recent years, a number of competing theories have arisen regarding the moral significance of anim...
Kant holds that the applicability of the moral ‘ought’ depends on a kind of agent-causal freedom tha...
Kant tells us in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals that rational nature is an end in itsel...
The debate concerning human rationality has been revolving around four main standpoints: 1) Unbounde...
I argue that a Kantian inspired investigation into animal morality is both a plausible and coherent ...
This article addresses three questions concerning Kant’s views on non-rational animals: do they intu...
Kant holds that some nonhuman animals “are acquainted with” objects, despite lacking conceptual capa...
The present paper aims to proceed to a succinct analysis of Leibniz"s Principles of Nature and Grace...
Kant holds that some nonhuman animals “are acquainted with” objects, despite lacking conceptual capa...
The essay investigates whether from a Kantian perspective, we can gain insights for a deeper underst...
While growing empirical evidence suggests a continuity between human and non-human psychology, many ...
Both in historical debates and in recent discussions, the Guise of the Good Thesis represents a genu...
A variety of interpreters have argued that Kant construes the animality of human beings as ‘transfor...
Kant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically distinct e...
20 pagesKant is often criticized for his strict separation of humans and animals as categorically di...
In recent years, a number of competing theories have arisen regarding the moral significance of anim...
Kant holds that the applicability of the moral ‘ought’ depends on a kind of agent-causal freedom tha...
Kant tells us in the Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals that rational nature is an end in itsel...
The debate concerning human rationality has been revolving around four main standpoints: 1) Unbounde...
I argue that a Kantian inspired investigation into animal morality is both a plausible and coherent ...
This article addresses three questions concerning Kant’s views on non-rational animals: do they intu...
Kant holds that some nonhuman animals “are acquainted with” objects, despite lacking conceptual capa...
The present paper aims to proceed to a succinct analysis of Leibniz"s Principles of Nature and Grace...
Kant holds that some nonhuman animals “are acquainted with” objects, despite lacking conceptual capa...
The essay investigates whether from a Kantian perspective, we can gain insights for a deeper underst...
While growing empirical evidence suggests a continuity between human and non-human psychology, many ...
Both in historical debates and in recent discussions, the Guise of the Good Thesis represents a genu...