This paper explores the potential of the perspective of epistemic injustice to reconcile medical sociology’s attention to the micro level of experience and interpersonal exchange, and disability studies’ focus on the macro level of oppressive structures. The first part of the paper provides an overview of the concept of epistemic injustice and its key instances – testimonial, hermeneutical, and contributory injustice. We also consider previous applications of the concept in the fields of healthcare and disability, and we contextualise our investigation by discussing key features of postsocialism from the perspective of epistemic injustice. In the second part, we explore specific epistemic injustices experienced by people who use disability ...
This dissertation argues that the discourse of epistemic injustice and Julia Kristeva\u27s oeuvre of...
Theoretical work on disability is going through an expansive period, built on the growing recognitio...
This article examines how the process of constructing knowledge on impairment has affected the insti...
This paper explores the potential of the perspective of epistemic injustice to reconcile medical soc...
This chapter canvases a number of ways that issues surrounding disability intersect with social epis...
Epistemic injustice has rapidly become a powerful tool for analysis of otherwise hidden social harm...
Epistemic injustice has rapidly become a powerful tool for analysis of otherwise hidden social harms...
This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin...
Disability benefits function by demarcating categories of need (the administrative category of disab...
This paper offers an overview of the philosophical work on epistemic injustices as it relates to psy...
This paper explores injustices experienced by disabled people in the postsocialist countries of Cent...
What makes an injustice epistemic rather than ethical or political? How does the former, more recent...
Disability benefits function by demarcating categories of need (the administrative category of disab...
Ill persons suffer from a variety of epistemically-inflected harms and wrongs. Many of these are int...
This dissertation argues that the discourse of epistemic injustice and Julia Kristeva\u27s oeuvre of...
Theoretical work on disability is going through an expansive period, built on the growing recognitio...
This article examines how the process of constructing knowledge on impairment has affected the insti...
This paper explores the potential of the perspective of epistemic injustice to reconcile medical soc...
This chapter canvases a number of ways that issues surrounding disability intersect with social epis...
Epistemic injustice has rapidly become a powerful tool for analysis of otherwise hidden social harm...
Epistemic injustice has rapidly become a powerful tool for analysis of otherwise hidden social harms...
This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin...
Disability benefits function by demarcating categories of need (the administrative category of disab...
This paper offers an overview of the philosophical work on epistemic injustices as it relates to psy...
This paper explores injustices experienced by disabled people in the postsocialist countries of Cent...
What makes an injustice epistemic rather than ethical or political? How does the former, more recent...
Disability benefits function by demarcating categories of need (the administrative category of disab...
Ill persons suffer from a variety of epistemically-inflected harms and wrongs. Many of these are int...
This dissertation argues that the discourse of epistemic injustice and Julia Kristeva\u27s oeuvre of...
Theoretical work on disability is going through an expansive period, built on the growing recognitio...
This article examines how the process of constructing knowledge on impairment has affected the insti...