The Executive Board of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) read with much interest the recent comment by Lloyd and Tahon (Science depends on nomenclature, but nomenclature is not science. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 123–124 (2022))1. The authors raise various criticisms of recent ICSP activities to which we respond here
In the current Opinion we respond to the major concerns by Bisgaard et al. (2019) and Overmann et al...
In July last year, it was my pleasure to travel to Valencia as the Microbiology Society delegate to ...
The Editorial Board for the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) has compiled pr...
To the Editor — The members of the Executive Board of the International Committee on Systematics of ...
We have followed with great interest the letters to Trends in Microbiology from Gribaldo and Brochie...
The statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) describe one of the...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) discussed and rejected in 2020 a pr...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) discussed and rejected in 2020 a pr...
Here we have compiled answers to questions about the activities of the International Committee on Sy...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) discussed and rejected in 2020 a pr...
Recently, a new code of nomenclature for prokaryotes having genomes as nomenclatural types has been ...
Since January 1, 2001, the only acceptable nomenclatural type for species under the International Co...
KNAPP, Sandra [et al]. Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: the evolving codes of nomencla...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes has held an electronic discussion on propo...
Fourteen years have passed since the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) at...
In the current Opinion we respond to the major concerns by Bisgaard et al. (2019) and Overmann et al...
In July last year, it was my pleasure to travel to Valencia as the Microbiology Society delegate to ...
The Editorial Board for the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) has compiled pr...
To the Editor — The members of the Executive Board of the International Committee on Systematics of ...
We have followed with great interest the letters to Trends in Microbiology from Gribaldo and Brochie...
The statutes of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) describe one of the...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) discussed and rejected in 2020 a pr...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) discussed and rejected in 2020 a pr...
Here we have compiled answers to questions about the activities of the International Committee on Sy...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) discussed and rejected in 2020 a pr...
Recently, a new code of nomenclature for prokaryotes having genomes as nomenclatural types has been ...
Since January 1, 2001, the only acceptable nomenclatural type for species under the International Co...
KNAPP, Sandra [et al]. Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: the evolving codes of nomencla...
The International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes has held an electronic discussion on propo...
Fourteen years have passed since the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP) at...
In the current Opinion we respond to the major concerns by Bisgaard et al. (2019) and Overmann et al...
In July last year, it was my pleasure to travel to Valencia as the Microbiology Society delegate to ...
The Editorial Board for the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) has compiled pr...