Written to acknowledge the completion of all editions of the Arden Shakespeare Series 3. An overview and examination of the editorial theory and practice of the Arden 3 Shakespeare series. This essay catalogues major initiatives in the series and for the first time examines its integration of women editors, it's contributions to Shakespeare textual theory and editorial practice, and considers its efforts towards inclusion and looks to the future of editing and the series itself
Shakespeare Survey is a yearbook of Shakespeare studies and production. Since 1948, the Survey has p...
Introduces a collection of essays which brings together leading scholars to examine crucial question...
[Excerpt] Recently, the University of Lisbon’s performance database was temporarily out of action wh...
Covering the changes in Shakespeare editorial theory and practice over the decades between the publi...
No-one reads a Shakespeare play more closely than an editor making a critical edition, although the ...
When the call for gender diversity in the Shakespearean editorial field first gained strength in the...
'Did Petrucchio spill the water?' Review of Ann Thompson and Gordon McMullan (eds.) In Arden: editin...
In a review of this kind it can be difficult to know where to stop; after all, 'editions and textua...
This book chapter was published in the book, The Struggle for Shakespeare's Text Twentieth-Century ...
Shakespeare editing in the twentieth century involves a history of practice, and a history of ideas ...
This article engages with one of the current critical and bibliographical concerns of Shakespeare st...
As the European Journal of Theatre and Performance is now steadily growing into a bi-annual publicat...
This essay is devoted to Shakespearean criticism in the UK between 1920 and 1940. I begin by examini...
poster abstractBecause Shakespeare is the world’s most canonical and most commercially successful se...
A brief commentary prepared by Elizabeth Mackay, PhD, Lecturer, English, on the following work: Will...
Shakespeare Survey is a yearbook of Shakespeare studies and production. Since 1948, the Survey has p...
Introduces a collection of essays which brings together leading scholars to examine crucial question...
[Excerpt] Recently, the University of Lisbon’s performance database was temporarily out of action wh...
Covering the changes in Shakespeare editorial theory and practice over the decades between the publi...
No-one reads a Shakespeare play more closely than an editor making a critical edition, although the ...
When the call for gender diversity in the Shakespearean editorial field first gained strength in the...
'Did Petrucchio spill the water?' Review of Ann Thompson and Gordon McMullan (eds.) In Arden: editin...
In a review of this kind it can be difficult to know where to stop; after all, 'editions and textua...
This book chapter was published in the book, The Struggle for Shakespeare's Text Twentieth-Century ...
Shakespeare editing in the twentieth century involves a history of practice, and a history of ideas ...
This article engages with one of the current critical and bibliographical concerns of Shakespeare st...
As the European Journal of Theatre and Performance is now steadily growing into a bi-annual publicat...
This essay is devoted to Shakespearean criticism in the UK between 1920 and 1940. I begin by examini...
poster abstractBecause Shakespeare is the world’s most canonical and most commercially successful se...
A brief commentary prepared by Elizabeth Mackay, PhD, Lecturer, English, on the following work: Will...
Shakespeare Survey is a yearbook of Shakespeare studies and production. Since 1948, the Survey has p...
Introduces a collection of essays which brings together leading scholars to examine crucial question...
[Excerpt] Recently, the University of Lisbon’s performance database was temporarily out of action wh...