This position paper of Working Group 2 of the European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis (COST Action CA17132; https://publicpolicyargument.eu) reviews goals and functions of public argumentation. Drawing on a variety of disciplines, the paper introduces basic distinctions and charts out options. It is meant to guide reflection on the conceptual basis for the Action’s subsequent research regarding the analysis, evaluation, and design of public argumentation
How to understand and assess arguments in which the popularity of an opinion is put forward as a rea...
Pressure and argumentation in public controversiesDiscussants in a public controversy are also playe...
International audienceLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning explores the links between Humanities and the...
This position paper of Working Group 2 of the European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy A...
This article investigates the implications of goal-legislation for legal argumentation. In goal-regu...
When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rathe...
In this paper, I critically examine the main accounts of goals in argumentative discourse, aiming to...
This report reflects in its structure the basic rationale of WG3 approach: it starts by listing some...
This open access book addresses communicative aspects of the current COVID-19 pandemic as well as th...
The Argument Web is maturing as both a platform built upon a synthesis of many contemporary theories...
Contemporary theory of argumentation offers many insights about the ways in which, in the context of...
@article{dung:aij95, author ="P. Dung", title=" and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning,...
For the development of computation tools to support the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative...
peer reviewedThis report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15...
How to understand and assess arguments in which the popularity of an opinion is put forward as a rea...
Pressure and argumentation in public controversiesDiscussants in a public controversy are also playe...
International audienceLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning explores the links between Humanities and the...
This position paper of Working Group 2 of the European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy A...
This article investigates the implications of goal-legislation for legal argumentation. In goal-regu...
When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rathe...
In this paper, I critically examine the main accounts of goals in argumentative discourse, aiming to...
This report reflects in its structure the basic rationale of WG3 approach: it starts by listing some...
This open access book addresses communicative aspects of the current COVID-19 pandemic as well as th...
The Argument Web is maturing as both a platform built upon a synthesis of many contemporary theories...
Contemporary theory of argumentation offers many insights about the ways in which, in the context of...
@article{dung:aij95, author ="P. Dung", title=" and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning,...
For the development of computation tools to support the pragma-dialectical analysis of argumentative...
peer reviewedThis report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15...
How to understand and assess arguments in which the popularity of an opinion is put forward as a rea...
Pressure and argumentation in public controversiesDiscussants in a public controversy are also playe...
International audienceLogic, Argumentation & Reasoning explores the links between Humanities and the...