We consider a rent-seeking contest where players compete in groups for a prize of given value. One group has private information about its number of members, which can be either small or large. The other groups have possibly different but publicly known sizes. We present an explicit characterization of the groups which are active in the unique equilibrium of the game, and relate the relative magnitude of group efforts to the size of the groups. We compare the decision of each type of the privately informed group to be active in equilibrium to the corresponding decision in a benchmark game with complete information.</p
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a rent-seeking contest where players compete in groups for a prize of given value. One g...
We consider a rent-seeking contest where players compete in groups for a prize of given value. One g...
We consider a rent-seeking contest where players compete in groups for a prize of given value. One g...
Competition between groups often involves prizes that have both a public and a private component. Th...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We offer a new explanation for the occurrence of delegation in rent-seeking contests. We consider a ...
We offer a new explanation for the occurrence of delegation in rent-seeking contests. We consider a ...
We offer a new explanation for the occurrence of delegation in rent-seeking contests. We consider a ...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a rent-seeking contest where players compete in groups for a prize of given value. One g...
We consider a rent-seeking contest where players compete in groups for a prize of given value. One g...
We consider a rent-seeking contest where players compete in groups for a prize of given value. One g...
Competition between groups often involves prizes that have both a public and a private component. Th...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We consider a two-player rent-seeking Tullock contest where one player has private information about...
We offer a new explanation for the occurrence of delegation in rent-seeking contests. We consider a ...
We offer a new explanation for the occurrence of delegation in rent-seeking contests. We consider a ...
We offer a new explanation for the occurrence of delegation in rent-seeking contests. We consider a ...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...
We consider a two-player Tullock rent-seeking contest with uncertain discriminatory power in the con...