This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive attitudes towards it in the Muslim world. It argues that this democracy paradox is understandable from the perspective of the principle of diminishing marginal utility: people value highly that of which they have little. This reasoning implies, however, that surveys like the World Values Surveys (WVS) elicit circumstance-driven marginal preferences rather than culturally determined attitudinal traits. Empirical evidence showing that individuals living in undemocratic societies have much more favorable inclinations towards democracy supports our argument.</p
In this paper I study between and within country differences in attitudes towards democracy, focusin...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
Item does not contain fulltextThis paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels ...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
Abstract This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democ-racy and pos...
Scholars and theoreticians have long argued about the compatibility of Islam and democracy. Bush adm...
This study examines how Muslims understand democracy and its essential components. We hypothesize th...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...
Several recent studies have reached opposite conclusions about whether Muslim countries are less dem...
In this paper I study between and within country differences in attitudes towards democracy, focusin...
In this paper I study between and within country differences in attitudes towards democracy, focusin...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
Item does not contain fulltextThis paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels ...
This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democracy and positive atti...
Abstract This paper explains the observed combination of relatively low levels of democ-racy and pos...
Scholars and theoreticians have long argued about the compatibility of Islam and democracy. Bush adm...
This study examines how Muslims understand democracy and its essential components. We hypothesize th...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...
Several recent studies have reached opposite conclusions about whether Muslim countries are less dem...
In this paper I study between and within country differences in attitudes towards democracy, focusin...
In this paper I study between and within country differences in attitudes towards democracy, focusin...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...
Using the POLITY IV and Freedom House indices, Rowley and Smith (2009) found that countries with Mus...