This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the basis of a survey of classical and contemporary definitions of argument, a set of assumptions is formulated regarding the linguistic and pragmatic aspects of arguments. It is demonstrated how these assumptions yield four different argument forms: (1) first-order predicate arguments, (2) first-order subject arguments, (3) second-order subject arguments, and (4) second-order predicate arguments. These argument forms are then further described and illustrated by means of concrete examples, and it is explained how they are visually represented in the Periodic Table of Arguments
This paper has a dual purpose: it both seeks to introduce the other works in this issue by illustrat...
Abstract: Do not define argument by its use to persuade. for other uses of arguments exist. An argum...
International audienceThis paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in whic...
This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the bas...
The existing classifications of arguments are unsatisfying in a number of ways. This paper proposes ...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
In the last quarter-century, the emergence of argumentation theory has spurred the development of an...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epistemologic...
Abstract. Starting from a typology of argumentative forms proposed in linguistics by Apothéloz, and...
The paper is a short presentation of some of the main ideas of the author's "Practical Theory of Arg...
The aim of this paper is to indicate the systematic place of arguments based on the concept of analo...
Abstract. We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the bas...
We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for dev...
We revisit a debate initiated some 15 years ago by Ray Elugardo and Robert Stainton about the domain...
Includes bibliographical references (p. 87-88).xiv, 88 p. ;A Rulebook for Arguments is a succinct in...
This paper has a dual purpose: it both seeks to introduce the other works in this issue by illustrat...
Abstract: Do not define argument by its use to persuade. for other uses of arguments exist. An argum...
International audienceThis paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in whic...
This paper provides a theoretical rationale for distinguishing four basic argument forms. On the bas...
The existing classifications of arguments are unsatisfying in a number of ways. This paper proposes ...
People always talk, discuss, argue, criticize or contradict each other. Have you ever thought of how...
In the last quarter-century, the emergence of argumentation theory has spurred the development of an...
The paper develops a classificatory system of basic argument types on the basis of the epistemologic...
Abstract. Starting from a typology of argumentative forms proposed in linguistics by Apothéloz, and...
The paper is a short presentation of some of the main ideas of the author's "Practical Theory of Arg...
The aim of this paper is to indicate the systematic place of arguments based on the concept of analo...
Abstract. We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the bas...
We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for dev...
We revisit a debate initiated some 15 years ago by Ray Elugardo and Robert Stainton about the domain...
Includes bibliographical references (p. 87-88).xiv, 88 p. ;A Rulebook for Arguments is a succinct in...
This paper has a dual purpose: it both seeks to introduce the other works in this issue by illustrat...
Abstract: Do not define argument by its use to persuade. for other uses of arguments exist. An argum...
International audienceThis paper aims at laying some foundations of a logic of argumentation in whic...