This paper is the last part of a series of three articles concerning the structure of justification. The author discusses contextualism regarding the structure of justification in the versions put forward by David Annis and Michael Williams. Williams explicitly contrasts his view with both foundationalist and coherentist theories. He gives a novel and valuable account of the system of beliefs and the structure of justification. Still, one can have doubts as to its normative dimension, i.e. as to whether it correctly shows what the structure of justification should be like from the epistemic point of view
Two natural ideas we have about justification are that we are justified by basing our beliefs on goo...
I argue that Forst’s justification paradigm is less radical than claimed in that it fails to establi...
Essential to our self-conception as rational human animals is that we are the makers and takers of r...
This paper is the second part of a series of articles concerning the structure of justification. The...
This paper presents a new argument for a form of contextualism about 'justified belief', the argumen...
The paper explores a structural account of propositional justification in terms of the notion of bei...
This paper is the first part of a series of articles about the structure of justification. I outline...
Determining knowledge happens by indexically attuned\ud justification. One may also say that knowled...
This article argues that “justification” denotes distinct technical properties in contemporary epist...
Foundationalism, as a theory of justification and knowledge, is often associated with Enlightenment ...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
I shall investigate Wittgenstein's view of the structure of justification comparing it to Foundation...
Suppose we are prepared to conceive the meaning of a sentence as a classification criterion which en...
Abstract: In a stage-wise view of the process of constructing and realizing a system of freedoms and...
1. Foundation-oriented epistemologies and their main problems According to the traditional analysis,...
Two natural ideas we have about justification are that we are justified by basing our beliefs on goo...
I argue that Forst’s justification paradigm is less radical than claimed in that it fails to establi...
Essential to our self-conception as rational human animals is that we are the makers and takers of r...
This paper is the second part of a series of articles concerning the structure of justification. The...
This paper presents a new argument for a form of contextualism about 'justified belief', the argumen...
The paper explores a structural account of propositional justification in terms of the notion of bei...
This paper is the first part of a series of articles about the structure of justification. I outline...
Determining knowledge happens by indexically attuned\ud justification. One may also say that knowled...
This article argues that “justification” denotes distinct technical properties in contemporary epist...
Foundationalism, as a theory of justification and knowledge, is often associated with Enlightenment ...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
I shall investigate Wittgenstein's view of the structure of justification comparing it to Foundation...
Suppose we are prepared to conceive the meaning of a sentence as a classification criterion which en...
Abstract: In a stage-wise view of the process of constructing and realizing a system of freedoms and...
1. Foundation-oriented epistemologies and their main problems According to the traditional analysis,...
Two natural ideas we have about justification are that we are justified by basing our beliefs on goo...
I argue that Forst’s justification paradigm is less radical than claimed in that it fails to establi...
Essential to our self-conception as rational human animals is that we are the makers and takers of r...