Judging on nullity of marriage in virtue of total simulation together with other grounds of nullity within marital consent in decisions of the Roman Rota

Trybunał Roty Rzymskiej, w publikowanych wyrokach dotyczących symulacji całkowitej zgody małżeńskiej łączy ją w tym samym podmiocie z innymi tytułami nieważności małzeństwa w obrębie zgody małżeńskiej. Trzeba wyraźnie zaznaczyć, że symulacja całkowita zgody małżeńskiej pozwala się odróżnić od innych tytułów nieważności małżeństwa w obrębie zgody gdyż w symulacji kontrahent wyraźnie nie chce małżeństwa. W innych zaś tytułach nieważności występuje niezdolność bądź wada zgody małżeńskiej lub zgoda warunkowa na małżeństwo. Zawsze jednak mamy do czynienia z wolą zawarcia małżeństwa. Takie ujęcie na gruncie procesowym tworzy problemy w orzekaniu w tym samym podmiocie zaskarżenia małżeństwa symulacji całkowitej z innymi tytułami nieważności.Rotal jurisprudence, trying cases in virtue of total simulation and other grounds of nullity in the same subject such as: incapacity due to causes of psychic nature of which in can. 1095 no. 3 CIC, gives us the following solutions: who is not capable to express marital consent, the more is not capable to exclude this consent through a positive act of will. According to can. 1095 no. 3 CIC, the matter is complicated, as the jurisprudence says. Total simulation and other grounds of nullity of which in can. 1095 no. 1‒2 CIC, can be considered alternatively. The way in which total simulation and error are treated depends in jurisprudence on the kind of error. Error concerning the person is related to the mind, and total simulation is connected with a positive act of will. Fundamental difference is that in every form of error, including fraud, the contractor has a will to enter marriage and in total simulation his will is positively opposing the marriage. Considering error in general, it should be treated as an autonomous ground of nullity and should not be merged with total simulation. Total and partial simulation are similar. Both grounds demand a positive act of will. The difference, underlined by rotal decisions, is: requirement of awareness of the party that excludes marriage totally, which is not necessary in partial simulation. The second difference is the object of exclusion, i.e. the marriage (in case of total simulation) and essential element or property (in case of partial simulation). The condition assumes the existing of a positive act of will and the awareness of stipulated condition (as well as in case of total simulation). These grounds should be treated as non‑compatible. Nullity of marriage on the ground of force or grave fear and total simulation in the same subject is considered to be very problematic in jurisprudence. Marital intention (although compelled) accompanies the marriage contracted due to force and grave fear (this intention constitutes a marital consent defect). Total simulation is lack of marital consent and intention opposing the marriage. In some rotal decisions one can come across a total simulation that is made due to force and grave fear. It seems logical to decide on the basis of both of these nullity titles in the same subject