Frank Ankersmit In Praise of Subjectivity Frank Ankersmit argues that even in ancient times the historian's moral and political convictions affected the shape of his account of history. But other factors may also contribute to what we often describe as the historian's 'subjectivity' - his favourite field of research, characteristic mannerisms of style, a particular way of conducting an argument and finally his own intellectual capacities and limitations. In his essay, Ankersmit invokes the traditional views of subjectivity and objectivity, and argues that they miss an essential point about the source of the actual problem with subjectivity, which lies in the logical proximity of (historical) truth and value. Ultimately, he c...
In this paper I revisit nineteenth-century debates over historical objectivity and the political fun...
Nineteenth century historiography has set up the fundamental skills’ repertoire of the professional ...
We do not learn from the past nor from possible analogies between the past and the present. Rather w...
Frank Ankersmit In Praise of Subjectivity Frank Ankersmit argues that even in ancien...
In this paper, I show how the phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions and method converge on the...
The controversy as to whether or not historical truth is objective is as old as the profession itsel...
One of the problems confronting historians in historical writing is the question of objectivity. Obj...
Both the (logical-)positivist and the hermeneuticist approach to historical writing felt a greater a...
Can historians be truly objective? Is a relativist standpoint a threat to history as an academic dis...
In my reply I focus on Professor Saari's criticism of my views on the notions of historical truth, r...
Doubtless no one has written more over the last three decades on certain themes in the philosophy of...
Many philosophers have rejected the possibility of objective historical knowledge on the grounds tha...
Objectivity is the voice of history. In history, more emphasis is placed on facts than on personalit...
In this article I revisit nineteenth‐century debates over historical objectivity and the political f...
3.2 Historical objectivity Another issue that provoked significant attention among analytic philosop...
In this paper I revisit nineteenth-century debates over historical objectivity and the political fun...
Nineteenth century historiography has set up the fundamental skills’ repertoire of the professional ...
We do not learn from the past nor from possible analogies between the past and the present. Rather w...
Frank Ankersmit In Praise of Subjectivity Frank Ankersmit argues that even in ancien...
In this paper, I show how the phenomenological and hermeneutic traditions and method converge on the...
The controversy as to whether or not historical truth is objective is as old as the profession itsel...
One of the problems confronting historians in historical writing is the question of objectivity. Obj...
Both the (logical-)positivist and the hermeneuticist approach to historical writing felt a greater a...
Can historians be truly objective? Is a relativist standpoint a threat to history as an academic dis...
In my reply I focus on Professor Saari's criticism of my views on the notions of historical truth, r...
Doubtless no one has written more over the last three decades on certain themes in the philosophy of...
Many philosophers have rejected the possibility of objective historical knowledge on the grounds tha...
Objectivity is the voice of history. In history, more emphasis is placed on facts than on personalit...
In this article I revisit nineteenth‐century debates over historical objectivity and the political f...
3.2 Historical objectivity Another issue that provoked significant attention among analytic philosop...
In this paper I revisit nineteenth-century debates over historical objectivity and the political fun...
Nineteenth century historiography has set up the fundamental skills’ repertoire of the professional ...
We do not learn from the past nor from possible analogies between the past and the present. Rather w...