Recently, in some negotiation application areas, the usual assumption that negotiators are symmetric has been relaxed. In particular, weights have been introduced to the Nash Bargaining Solution to reflect the different powers of the players. Yet, we feel that operating with non-symmetric bargaining solutions and their implications is not well understood. We analyze the properties and optimization of the non-symmetric Nash Bargaining Solution and of a non-symmetric Kalai–Smorodinsky Bargaining Solution. We provide extensive comparative statics, then comment on the implications of the concepts in supply chain coordination contexts
A bargaining solution balances fairness and efficiency if each player’s payoff lies between the mini...
This Version: April 2011Conditions α and β are two well-known rationality conditions in the theory o...
In the 1950s, the Nobel Prize winner John F. Nash has shown that under certain conditions, the best ...
We present a generalization to the Harsanyi solution for non-transferable utility (NTU) games based ...
In this paper we deal with the extension of Nash bargaining theory to nonconvex problems. By focussi...
In this note we apply a Nash bargaining model with non-symmetric bargaining power to negotiation ove...
This paper studies the Nash solution to nonconvex bargaining problems. The Nash solution in such a c...
We present a characterization of the Nash Bargaining Solution on a domain which is not closed under ...
This paper studies compact and comprehensive bargaining prob-lems for n players and axiomatically ch...
The Nash Bargaining Solution is characterised by using the new axiom of Maximal Symmetry in place of...
In this note I study Nash bargaining when the utility possibility set of the bargaining problem is n...
This paper studies compact and comprehensive bargaining prob-lems for n players and axiomatically ch...
We investigate whether bargaining solutions are immune to the transfer paradox for n-person bargaini...
We first generalize the Nash bargaining solution to the case where decision makers are not necessari...
Conditions α and β are two well-known rationality conditions in the theory of rational choice. This ...
A bargaining solution balances fairness and efficiency if each player’s payoff lies between the mini...
This Version: April 2011Conditions α and β are two well-known rationality conditions in the theory o...
In the 1950s, the Nobel Prize winner John F. Nash has shown that under certain conditions, the best ...
We present a generalization to the Harsanyi solution for non-transferable utility (NTU) games based ...
In this paper we deal with the extension of Nash bargaining theory to nonconvex problems. By focussi...
In this note we apply a Nash bargaining model with non-symmetric bargaining power to negotiation ove...
This paper studies the Nash solution to nonconvex bargaining problems. The Nash solution in such a c...
We present a characterization of the Nash Bargaining Solution on a domain which is not closed under ...
This paper studies compact and comprehensive bargaining prob-lems for n players and axiomatically ch...
The Nash Bargaining Solution is characterised by using the new axiom of Maximal Symmetry in place of...
In this note I study Nash bargaining when the utility possibility set of the bargaining problem is n...
This paper studies compact and comprehensive bargaining prob-lems for n players and axiomatically ch...
We investigate whether bargaining solutions are immune to the transfer paradox for n-person bargaini...
We first generalize the Nash bargaining solution to the case where decision makers are not necessari...
Conditions α and β are two well-known rationality conditions in the theory of rational choice. This ...
A bargaining solution balances fairness and efficiency if each player’s payoff lies between the mini...
This Version: April 2011Conditions α and β are two well-known rationality conditions in the theory o...
In the 1950s, the Nobel Prize winner John F. Nash has shown that under certain conditions, the best ...