First paragraph: The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Abduction Convention”) seeks to secure the prompt return of children in cases of wrongful removal or retention. It operates on the assumption that this is in the best interests of children except for certain limited circumstances provided for by Articles 13 and 20 of the Abduction Convention. There is an established body of case-law relating to the Convention which for the most part fits into a pattern of uniform interpretation. National caselaw concerning the Abduction Convention has on the whole struck the right balance
In cases of international child abduction, human rights law and private international law are in con...
Examines the traditional narrow interpretation of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Inter...
The basic premise of the Hague Child Abduction Convention is that the welfare judgment required when...
First paragraph: The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“t...
International child abduction cases consist of complex and sensitive issues that have become more co...
The Hague Convention aims to deter future abductors and demonstrate mutual respect for the laws of i...
Case law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and appli...
Analyses case law on the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980...
This case note examines the Supreme Court’s decision in Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal)...
In the past few years, the number of cases involving international child abduction has risen signifi...
This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has clarified its jurisprudence on how ...
Since 1 August 1986 the United Kingdom has been party to two international conventions on child abdu...
The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the Convention) was enac...
This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has clarified its jurisprudence on how ...
This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has clarified its jurisprudence on how ...
In cases of international child abduction, human rights law and private international law are in con...
Examines the traditional narrow interpretation of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Inter...
The basic premise of the Hague Child Abduction Convention is that the welfare judgment required when...
First paragraph: The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“t...
International child abduction cases consist of complex and sensitive issues that have become more co...
The Hague Convention aims to deter future abductors and demonstrate mutual respect for the laws of i...
Case law from the European Court of Human Rights has been important for the interpretation and appli...
Analyses case law on the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction 1980...
This case note examines the Supreme Court’s decision in Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal)...
In the past few years, the number of cases involving international child abduction has risen signifi...
This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has clarified its jurisprudence on how ...
Since 1 August 1986 the United Kingdom has been party to two international conventions on child abdu...
The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the Convention) was enac...
This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has clarified its jurisprudence on how ...
This article examines how the European Court of Human Rights has clarified its jurisprudence on how ...
In cases of international child abduction, human rights law and private international law are in con...
Examines the traditional narrow interpretation of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Inter...
The basic premise of the Hague Child Abduction Convention is that the welfare judgment required when...