Add to ORKGOf the numerous provisions in the Indiana Rules of Evidence, few have proved as complicated in application as Rule 404(b). The rule-which provides generally that evidence of crimes, wrongs, or acts other than the conduct that is the subject of the particular case is not admissible as proof of the actor's character, but is admissible for other purposes'-has produced challenging cases in each of the years since the Indiana Rules of Evidence went into effect in 1994. This past year was no exception, as decisions of the Indiana Supreme Court and the Indiana Court of Appeals confronted the numerous problems of application raised by the rule.2 Because the rule remains the subject of confusion eight years after the adoption of the Indiana...
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
Some rules of evidence are complex. The federal rules governing the admissibility of hearsay stateme...
The judicial rules of Evidence, said their great expounder, were never meant to be an indirect proc...
The Indiana Rules of Evidence ("Rules") were codified in 1994. Since that time, the rules have been...
This past year was the third year for the Indiana courts under the new regime of the Indiana Rules ...
The admission of a criminal defendant’s prior bad acts can be a powerful tool for attaining a convic...
With rare exceptions, Indiana evidence law progresses slowly and holds closely to the traditional co...
The federal courts\u27 current approach to character evidence is widely recognized as problematic. A...
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
In Washington, the introduction of evidence of other misconduct to show intent or absence of mistake...
Defendants have the same right to offer Rule 404(b) evidence as prosecutors, and they are not requir...
Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), which governs the admissibility of other-acts evidence, is a mess, ...
This Note argues that, in a prosecution for a violation of a specific intent criminal statute, the g...
The purpose of this Article is to examine how federal circuit courts of appeals’ references to the i...
It is a fundamental principle of the American justice system that a defendant should be judged on th...
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
Some rules of evidence are complex. The federal rules governing the admissibility of hearsay stateme...
The judicial rules of Evidence, said their great expounder, were never meant to be an indirect proc...
The Indiana Rules of Evidence ("Rules") were codified in 1994. Since that time, the rules have been...
This past year was the third year for the Indiana courts under the new regime of the Indiana Rules ...
The admission of a criminal defendant’s prior bad acts can be a powerful tool for attaining a convic...
With rare exceptions, Indiana evidence law progresses slowly and holds closely to the traditional co...
The federal courts\u27 current approach to character evidence is widely recognized as problematic. A...
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
In Washington, the introduction of evidence of other misconduct to show intent or absence of mistake...
Defendants have the same right to offer Rule 404(b) evidence as prosecutors, and they are not requir...
Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), which governs the admissibility of other-acts evidence, is a mess, ...
This Note argues that, in a prosecution for a violation of a specific intent criminal statute, the g...
The purpose of this Article is to examine how federal circuit courts of appeals’ references to the i...
It is a fundamental principle of the American justice system that a defendant should be judged on th...
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
Some rules of evidence are complex. The federal rules governing the admissibility of hearsay stateme...
The judicial rules of Evidence, said their great expounder, were never meant to be an indirect proc...