The new Supreme Court is poised to bring the administrative state to a grinding halt. Five Justices have endorsed Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. United States—an opinion that threatens to invalidate countless regulatory statutes in which Congress has delegated significant policymaking authority to the Executive Branch. Justice Gorsuch claimed that the “text and history” of the Constitution required the Court to replace a longstanding constitutional doctrine that permits broad delegations with a more restrictive one. But the supposedly originalist arguments advanced by Justice Gorsuch and like-minded scholars run counter to the understandings of delegation that prevailed in the Founding Era. This Article brings to light previously ove...
To bolster a strong “Unitary Executive,” the Roberts Court has held that Congress can neither shield...
(Excerpt) The so-called “nondelegation doctrine” posits that Congress may not transfer its legislati...
This Article will address primarily the lack of textual and historical support for the Court\u27s na...
Nondelegation originalism is having its moment. Recent Supreme Court opinions suggest that a majorit...
This article refutes the claim that the Constitution was originally understood to contain a nondeleg...
In 1690, John Locke wrote that legislators “can have no power to transfer their authority of making ...
[Excerpt] The current federal government, with its burgeoning administrative agencies, does not emb...
The legitimacy of the administrative state appears to be in some jeopardy. Five justices of U.S. Sup...
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...
Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discern ...
In recent decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has become increasingly interventionist on issues relating...
The nondelegation doctrine theoretically limits Congress’s ability to delegate legislative powers to...
This Article lays out the reasons why legislators, judges, lawyers, laypersons, and even scholars sh...
The future of nondelegation is uncertain. Long considered an “axiom in constitutional law,” the nond...
One of the subthemes in the delegation debate concerns the importance of judicial review. The Suprem...
To bolster a strong “Unitary Executive,” the Roberts Court has held that Congress can neither shield...
(Excerpt) The so-called “nondelegation doctrine” posits that Congress may not transfer its legislati...
This Article will address primarily the lack of textual and historical support for the Court\u27s na...
Nondelegation originalism is having its moment. Recent Supreme Court opinions suggest that a majorit...
This article refutes the claim that the Constitution was originally understood to contain a nondeleg...
In 1690, John Locke wrote that legislators “can have no power to transfer their authority of making ...
[Excerpt] The current federal government, with its burgeoning administrative agencies, does not emb...
The legitimacy of the administrative state appears to be in some jeopardy. Five justices of U.S. Sup...
This article adopts a novel separation of powers framework to analyze the Rehnquist Court\u27s recen...
Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discern ...
In recent decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has become increasingly interventionist on issues relating...
The nondelegation doctrine theoretically limits Congress’s ability to delegate legislative powers to...
This Article lays out the reasons why legislators, judges, lawyers, laypersons, and even scholars sh...
The future of nondelegation is uncertain. Long considered an “axiom in constitutional law,” the nond...
One of the subthemes in the delegation debate concerns the importance of judicial review. The Suprem...
To bolster a strong “Unitary Executive,” the Roberts Court has held that Congress can neither shield...
(Excerpt) The so-called “nondelegation doctrine” posits that Congress may not transfer its legislati...
This Article will address primarily the lack of textual and historical support for the Court\u27s na...