When it is not possible to integrate a function we resort to Numerical Integration. For example the ubiquitous Normal curve tables are obtained using Numerical Integration. The antiderivative of the defining function for the normal curve involves the formula for antiderivative of e-x^2 which can\u27t be expressed in the terms of basic functions. Simpson\u27s rule is studied in most Calculus books, and in all undergraduate Numerical Analysis books, but proofs are not provided. Hence if one is interested in a proof of Simpson\u27s rule, either it can be found in advanced Numerical Analysis books as a special case of the so called Newton-Cotes formulas, or in math journals such as American Mathematical Monthly. My thesis adviser Hajrudin Fejzi...
In this paper, A Modified Trapezoidal Rule is presented for the evaluation of numerical integration;...
The objective is to calculate the integral of a function f over an interval (i.e. area under the cur...
In this study, we comment about a wrong proof, at least incomplete, of the closed Newton Cotes error...
We have calculated the definite integral by dividing the interval of integration [-1, 1] into 96 equ...
A straightforward three-point quadrature formula of closed type is derived that improves on Simpson'...
AbstractLet M(f) denote the midpoint rule and T(f) the trapezoidal rule for estimating ∫abf(x)dx. Th...
The objective in numerical integration is the approximation of a definite integral using numerical t...
A novel approach to deriving a family of quadrature formulae is presented. The first member of the n...
Tema ovog završnog rada je numerička integracija. Promatramo trapezno pravilo te generalizirano trap...
A generalization of the modified Simpson's rule is derived. Various error bounds for this generaliz...
Let M (f) denote the midpoint rule and T (f) the trapezoidal rule for estimating ∫ b a f(x) dx. Then...
Five ways how to introduce the basic Simpson’s rule for numerical integration within the first calcu...
Using the Intermediate Value Theorem we demonstrate the rules of Trapeze and Simpson's. Demonstratio...
AbstractThis paper is concerned with the numerical integration of functions by piecewise polynomial ...
This paper deals with the error analysis of the trapezoidal rule for the computation of Fourier type...
In this paper, A Modified Trapezoidal Rule is presented for the evaluation of numerical integration;...
The objective is to calculate the integral of a function f over an interval (i.e. area under the cur...
In this study, we comment about a wrong proof, at least incomplete, of the closed Newton Cotes error...
We have calculated the definite integral by dividing the interval of integration [-1, 1] into 96 equ...
A straightforward three-point quadrature formula of closed type is derived that improves on Simpson'...
AbstractLet M(f) denote the midpoint rule and T(f) the trapezoidal rule for estimating ∫abf(x)dx. Th...
The objective in numerical integration is the approximation of a definite integral using numerical t...
A novel approach to deriving a family of quadrature formulae is presented. The first member of the n...
Tema ovog završnog rada je numerička integracija. Promatramo trapezno pravilo te generalizirano trap...
A generalization of the modified Simpson's rule is derived. Various error bounds for this generaliz...
Let M (f) denote the midpoint rule and T (f) the trapezoidal rule for estimating ∫ b a f(x) dx. Then...
Five ways how to introduce the basic Simpson’s rule for numerical integration within the first calcu...
Using the Intermediate Value Theorem we demonstrate the rules of Trapeze and Simpson's. Demonstratio...
AbstractThis paper is concerned with the numerical integration of functions by piecewise polynomial ...
This paper deals with the error analysis of the trapezoidal rule for the computation of Fourier type...
In this paper, A Modified Trapezoidal Rule is presented for the evaluation of numerical integration;...
The objective is to calculate the integral of a function f over an interval (i.e. area under the cur...
In this study, we comment about a wrong proof, at least incomplete, of the closed Newton Cotes error...