Publisher Copyright: Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.In two recent papers, Mark McBride has attacked the interest theory of rights, both introducing new arguments and claiming that interest theorists have not successfully deflected Gopal Sreenivasan's earlier arguments. This essay replies to all of McBride's criticisms, showing them to be mistaken.Peer reviewe
The received view in Thomas Hobbes scholarship is that the individual rights described by Hobbes in ...
This paper gives criticism of certain provisions of the sociological theory of "jurisprudence of int...
This manuscript examines two accounts that discuss rights disputes. On the one hand, Russ Shafer-Lan...
In two recent papers, Mark McBride has attacked the interest theory of rights, both introducing new ...
This article introduces a new formulation of the interest theory of rights. The focus is on ‘Bentham...
In this essay, I defend the interest theory of rights against the argument that because some agents ...
This paper concerns the dominant conceptual or formal accounts of legal rights: the Interest and Wil...
I suggest a new role for authority and interest in the theory of right: Rights can be explicated as ...
In his Article, Professor Gottlieb argues that the United States Supreme Court does not consider the...
[FIRST PARAGRAPHS] The twentieth century saw a vigorous debate over the nature of rights. Will theo...
This article responds to papers by Joseph Bowen, Simon May, Zofia Stemplowska, and Nick Sage, focuse...
The twentieth century saw a vigorous debate over the nature of rights. Will theorists argued that t...
Within the study of the philosophy of law, there have been long standing disputes regarding the natu...
This thesis concerns the various concepts of rights and philosophical accounts of them. Chapter 1 ad...
In Part II, I will indicate how the Will Theory and the Interest Theory each capture distinct featur...
The received view in Thomas Hobbes scholarship is that the individual rights described by Hobbes in ...
This paper gives criticism of certain provisions of the sociological theory of "jurisprudence of int...
This manuscript examines two accounts that discuss rights disputes. On the one hand, Russ Shafer-Lan...
In two recent papers, Mark McBride has attacked the interest theory of rights, both introducing new ...
This article introduces a new formulation of the interest theory of rights. The focus is on ‘Bentham...
In this essay, I defend the interest theory of rights against the argument that because some agents ...
This paper concerns the dominant conceptual or formal accounts of legal rights: the Interest and Wil...
I suggest a new role for authority and interest in the theory of right: Rights can be explicated as ...
In his Article, Professor Gottlieb argues that the United States Supreme Court does not consider the...
[FIRST PARAGRAPHS] The twentieth century saw a vigorous debate over the nature of rights. Will theo...
This article responds to papers by Joseph Bowen, Simon May, Zofia Stemplowska, and Nick Sage, focuse...
The twentieth century saw a vigorous debate over the nature of rights. Will theorists argued that t...
Within the study of the philosophy of law, there have been long standing disputes regarding the natu...
This thesis concerns the various concepts of rights and philosophical accounts of them. Chapter 1 ad...
In Part II, I will indicate how the Will Theory and the Interest Theory each capture distinct featur...
The received view in Thomas Hobbes scholarship is that the individual rights described by Hobbes in ...
This paper gives criticism of certain provisions of the sociological theory of "jurisprudence of int...
This manuscript examines two accounts that discuss rights disputes. On the one hand, Russ Shafer-Lan...