Professor Cunningham was the winner of the 1988 Scholarly Paper Competition sponsored by the Association of American Law Schools. The following article is an abridged version of that winning paper, adapted from a transcript of his presentation to the 1988 AALS Annual Meeting. His thesis is that semantic analysis of common sense meanings of the word search can provide and approach to interpreteing the scope of the Fourth Amendment which is both faithful to the text and flexible enough to meet the demands of changing times. In a much longer article appearing in 73 Iowa Law Review No. 3 (March 1988) he supports his common sense approach with a detailed analysis of the amendment\u27s legislative history and its relation toe pre-Revolution...
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence governing the Fourth Amendment’s “threshold”—a word meant to refer...
This Article analyzes the United States Supreme Court\u27s numerous and shifting rhetorical discours...
In its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court heard five cases involving the Fourth Amendment. I...
Professor Cunningham was the winner of the 1988 Scholarly Paper Competition sponsored by the Associa...
This article offers a new technique for analyzing and evaluating competing interpretations of a lega...
The text of the Fourth Amendment provides no guidance about what makes a search unreasonable or when...
The Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of “unreasonable searches” is one of the most storied constitutio...
Conventional wisdom suggests that a constitutional right will constrain government actors. But a rig...
Professor Jeffrey Bellin’s excellent article advances a comprehensive and straightforward textual ap...
Supreme Court decisions regarding the Fourth Amendment are arbitrary, unpredictable and often border...
This Article attempts to answer such questions by examining the evolution of search-and-seizure law ...
Claims regarding the original or intended meaning of constitutional texts are commonplace in constit...
The vast majority of current Fourth Amendment doctrine is unfounded, incoherent, and dangerous. The ...
Book Review of The Fourth Amendment: Origins and Original Meaning , 602-1791. By William J. Cuddihy...
This Article will show how analytical methods of legal and linguistic scholarship can interact to ex...
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence governing the Fourth Amendment’s “threshold”—a word meant to refer...
This Article analyzes the United States Supreme Court\u27s numerous and shifting rhetorical discours...
In its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court heard five cases involving the Fourth Amendment. I...
Professor Cunningham was the winner of the 1988 Scholarly Paper Competition sponsored by the Associa...
This article offers a new technique for analyzing and evaluating competing interpretations of a lega...
The text of the Fourth Amendment provides no guidance about what makes a search unreasonable or when...
The Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of “unreasonable searches” is one of the most storied constitutio...
Conventional wisdom suggests that a constitutional right will constrain government actors. But a rig...
Professor Jeffrey Bellin’s excellent article advances a comprehensive and straightforward textual ap...
Supreme Court decisions regarding the Fourth Amendment are arbitrary, unpredictable and often border...
This Article attempts to answer such questions by examining the evolution of search-and-seizure law ...
Claims regarding the original or intended meaning of constitutional texts are commonplace in constit...
The vast majority of current Fourth Amendment doctrine is unfounded, incoherent, and dangerous. The ...
Book Review of The Fourth Amendment: Origins and Original Meaning , 602-1791. By William J. Cuddihy...
This Article will show how analytical methods of legal and linguistic scholarship can interact to ex...
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence governing the Fourth Amendment’s “threshold”—a word meant to refer...
This Article analyzes the United States Supreme Court\u27s numerous and shifting rhetorical discours...
In its 1990 Term, the United States Supreme Court heard five cases involving the Fourth Amendment. I...