Add to ORKGThe article presents a critical reassessment of the legal philosophical writings of Joseph Raz. The critique develops from the author’s previous argument that law is – contra recent near-consensus – best understood as “the command of the sovereign, backed by force.” Given that this is the distinctly defining feature of law, Raz’s extended preoccupation with “reasons for obeying law” is misplaced and even nonsensical
The article critically examines Joseph Raz's approach regarding the distinction between the nature a...
The question considered in the session was whether the concern of legal ethics is the morality of la...
This paper analyses and criticizes Joseph Raz's attacks on coherentist theories. It is argued that R...
The article presents a critical reassessment of the legal philosophical writings of Joseph Raz. The ...
Joseph Raz employs a methodology according to which we can learn truths about the nature of law by e...
Joseph Raz´s calls our attention toward the conceptual link between legal norms and reasons for acti...
I recently published a long article\u27 discussing a variety of topics from Joseph Raz\u27s The Mora...
From a critical review of the literature, we analyze the incompatibility between the possibility of ...
In this book Joseph Raz develops his views on some of the central questions in practical philosophy:...
This classic collection of essays, first published in 1979, has had an enduring influence on philoso...
Two central issues in literature discussing legal authority seems to the the questions of what the l...
The title of this books marks out a subject both fitting and timely for a confessed legal positivist...
As two parts of one overarching legal positivist project, it is likely assumed that the constitutive...
Joseph Raz’s theory of authority has become influential among moral, political, and legal philosophe...
Over the last twenty seven years Joseph Raz has written, mainly in a series of articles, a considera...
The article critically examines Joseph Raz's approach regarding the distinction between the nature a...
The question considered in the session was whether the concern of legal ethics is the morality of la...
This paper analyses and criticizes Joseph Raz's attacks on coherentist theories. It is argued that R...
The article presents a critical reassessment of the legal philosophical writings of Joseph Raz. The ...
Joseph Raz employs a methodology according to which we can learn truths about the nature of law by e...
Joseph Raz´s calls our attention toward the conceptual link between legal norms and reasons for acti...
I recently published a long article\u27 discussing a variety of topics from Joseph Raz\u27s The Mora...
From a critical review of the literature, we analyze the incompatibility between the possibility of ...
In this book Joseph Raz develops his views on some of the central questions in practical philosophy:...
This classic collection of essays, first published in 1979, has had an enduring influence on philoso...
Two central issues in literature discussing legal authority seems to the the questions of what the l...
The title of this books marks out a subject both fitting and timely for a confessed legal positivist...
As two parts of one overarching legal positivist project, it is likely assumed that the constitutive...
Joseph Raz’s theory of authority has become influential among moral, political, and legal philosophe...
Over the last twenty seven years Joseph Raz has written, mainly in a series of articles, a considera...
The article critically examines Joseph Raz's approach regarding the distinction between the nature a...
The question considered in the session was whether the concern of legal ethics is the morality of la...
This paper analyses and criticizes Joseph Raz's attacks on coherentist theories. It is argued that R...